Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: [kitten] WGLC of draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-oauth-18

2015-01-02 Thread Ebling, Sebastian
Hello, There is a little typo in Section 3.2.2: Replace "The URL for for a document" with "The URL for a document". Section 3. contains "2. Server responds with a successful authentication. In the case where authorization fails the server sends an error result, then client MUST then send

[OAUTH-WG] review: draft-richer-oauth-chain-00.txt

2012-11-30 Thread Ebling, Sebastian
Hi Phil, Some comments on draft-richer-oauth-chain-00.txt: Section 3.1. - I dislike the name of the grant type. "redelegate" is the use case but not the grant presented to the AS from RS1. I suggest to use "access_token" according to other grant types like authorization_code, password, refresh_

Re: [OAUTH-WG] issuing new refresh tokens

2010-09-03 Thread Ebling, Sebastian
+1 This is not too complicated for the client but improves security. regards Sebastian Ebling > -Original Message- > From: Stefanie Dronia [mailto:sdro...@gmx.de] > Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 9:24 AM > To: oauth@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] issuing new refresh tokens > >