-- Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* Watson Ladd
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2025 3:08 PM
> *To:* Deb Cooley
> *Cc:* Brian Campbell ; IETF
> oauth WG
> *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] Re: Updates to RFC 7523
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On
occurs in this (very long) message
chain.
Deb Cooley
Sec AD
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 1:21 PM Denis wrote:
> The IESG has received a request from the Web Authorization Protocol WG
> (oauth) to consider the following document: - 'Selective Disclosure for JWTs
> (SD-JWT)'
>
e, it will be sorted by next Thursday. And once the wg thinks
it is ready to go, we can expedite on the IESG/RFC Editor end.
Deb
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 7:51 AM Deb Cooley wrote:
> I was at the OAUTH interim where this was discussed. I did feel like the
> current course was more stra
I was at the OAUTH interim where this was discussed. I did feel like the
current course was more straightforward for those implementing. [if this
was discussed at 122, my memory fails me]
As a caution, I have added this issue to the next IESG informal meeting. I
will relay the result of that di
Is this message, sent to the oauth list, different than what is here:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/o9mStgXOwCEAZGcPlf-t_UrLmtU/
???
Multiple comments, sent to multiple locations just makes it all confusing.
I would prefer a single, concise list of comments, please.
I will actio
Alper,
This is a different sort of review - expert reviewers on a particular IANA
registry.
There are many drafts in the oauth working group that would be happy for a
review. Take a peek at the mailing list or at the data tracker, pick one
and review away.
Deb Cooley
Sec AD
On Tue, Apr 8
e any special provisions for only ignoring header
> parameters if they are specified as being ignored, but instead requires all
> header parameters to be ignored if they are not understood, except if they
> are critical.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 4:37 AM Deb Coole
Errata? Did I hear you say errata?
I can push the buttons to properly dispatch this. I think this includes
editing an errata and certainly includes adding notes to it. I need to
know what edits and or comments you want made, and what outcome (reject,
validate, hold for document update). Also h
Here are the comments on my AD review of this draft. Most of them will be
easy to fix, except for the normative references to changeable standards:
General: There are more than a couple of Normative references that are
pointing to 'living documents'. From my reading of the draft these
include:
At the risk of drawing oauth chairs ire and only because I happened to
be reading this thread w/ chagrin.
No one thinks that SD-JWT is a perfect answer to the problem. It isn't.
Sadly the perfect solution doesn't exist. So as we make our way to better
and better solutions, let us take this n
the issues Deb,
>
> The document editors will take an action to incorporate the indicated
> changes in the next draft.
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 6:58 AM Deb Cooley wrote:
>
>> +oauth working group and Paul:
>>
>> Denis,
>>
>> I have gone through ev
are both my general comments, and then blow by blow responses to your
42 issues.
Deb Cooley
---
My general comments on the issues:
1. End-User comments: These are implementation choices. Holder is
basically the front for all sorts of different
I want to add that I appreciate the authors' work to come to a resolution.
It was not easy work. I look forward to when these drafts are passed to me
(as Sec AD) for publication.
Deb Cooley
Sec AD
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 5:24 AM Brian Campbell wrote:
> Oh, and in case you missed it, t
TYVM,
Deb
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 11:30 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
wrote:
> Deb,
>
> Done.
>
>
> All,
>
> I have shuffled the agenda, so please take a look and let us know if you
> have any questions.
>
> Regards,
> Rifaat & Hannes
>
>
>
Thanks for the consideration,
Deb Cooley
Sec AD
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 6:33 PM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
wrote:
> All,
>
> The following is a draft agenda for the OAuth WG meeting in Dublin:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-121-oauth/
>
> Please, take a look and let us know
15 matches
Mail list logo
