[OAUTH-WG] Re: Call for adoption - RFC7523bis

I’m in favor of adoption. Thanks, -dhs -- Dean H. Saxe, CIDPRO (he/him) Principal Engineer Office of the CTO Beyond Identity dean.s...@beyondidentity.com On Feb 6, 2025 at 8:36:36 AM, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > All, > > This is a call for adoption for the *RFC75

[OAUTH-WG] Re: Reminder: Alternative text for sd-jwt privacy considerations.

plete.Best, PaulOn 1/9/25 8:32 PM, Watson Ladd wrote:On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 10:39 AM Dean Saxe wrote:I’m struggling with the same thing.  If there’s somewhere that this is described/documented it should be linked from the text.  I added the same comment to the PR.https://www.google.com/url?q=https://

[OAUTH-WG] Re: Reminder: Alternative text for sd-jwt privacy considerations.

I’m struggling with the same thing. If there’s somewhere that this is described/documented it should be linked from the text. I added the same comment to the PR. https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/pull/535#issuecomment-2580990520 -dhs -- Dean H. Saxe, CIDPRO

[OAUTH-WG] Re: WGLC for Token Status List

I would not be opposed to more examples and/or test vectors included in an appendix. I didn’t recognize that the examples were meant as test vectors and don’t recall that specifically being identified in the draft. -dhs -- Dean H. Saxe, CIDPRO Principal Engineer Offic

[OAUTH-WG] Re: WGLC for Token Status List

Oops, my mistake. I think the doc is ready to move forward. -dhs -- Dean H. Saxe, CIDPRO Principal Engineer Office of the CTO Beyond Identity dean.s...@beyondidentity.com On Jan 2, 2025 at 12:57:57 PM, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > Dean, Giuseppe, > > This is *not

[OAUTH-WG] Re: WGLC for Token Status List

I support adoption. Reading the text this morning I found a minor nit that I issued a PR to fix. This PR should not prevent WGLC since it corrects the use of a homonym and makes no technical edits. -dhs -- Dean H. Saxe, CIDPRO

[OAUTH-WG] Re: First party apps review notes

:43 AM, Dean Saxe wrote: > Following the discussion at the second OAuth WG meeting at IETF121, I > reviewed draft-parecki-oauth-first-party-apps-02. (N.B. This was the doc I > had on my Kindle when I started the review. Aaron confirmed that the doc > is the same as draft-ietf-oauth-f

[OAUTH-WG] First party apps review notes

Following the discussion at the second OAuth WG meeting at IETF121, I reviewed draft-parecki-oauth-first-party-apps-02. (N.B. This was the doc I had on my Kindle when I started the review. Aaron confirmed that the doc is the same as draft-ietf-oauth-first-party-apps-00, the latest doc just repres