fwiw, I also believe the draft is ready to progress.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 2:17 PM Brian Campbell wrote:
> Watson,
>
> I think perhaps there's a misalignment of goals here.
>
> My perspective is that the privacy considerations are good enough (and
> have been for several months now) for the dr
I want to express my gratitude to the OAuth WG for the discussion on media
types during the Thursday session last week.
The presentation was factual and well-reasoned. and the resulting "Dublin
Accord" reflects a similarly well-reasoned decision.
___
OAut
I agree with Watson.
I also don't understand what delays in the work would occur as a
consequence of managing it in a different group.
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023, 9:49 AM wrote:
> Hi Denis,
>
>
>
> It is true that the current OAuth charter does not address the three party
> model.
>
>
>
> This is why R
I am in favor of adoption
From: OAuth On Behalf Of Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2023 1:27 PM
To: oauth
Subject: [EXT] [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client
Authentication
All,
This is an official call for adoption for the Attestation-Based Client
Authenticati
I am in favor of adoption
From: OAuth On Behalf Of Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2023 1:25 PM
To: oauth
Subject: [EXT] [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - SD-JWT-based Verifiable
Credentials
All,
This is an official call for adoption for the SD-JWT-based Verifiable
Credentials draft
Recent decisions in the VCWG at W3C support the interpretation of alternate
credential types as Verifiable Credentials, provided there is a specified
transformation from that credential type into the VC Data Model.
Users of SD-JWT in the VCWG have expressed an interest in defining this
transfor
