Re: [OAUTH-WG] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-device-flow-11: (with COMMENT)

Hi, thanks for the response. Comments inline. I removed sections that seem resolved. Ben. > On Aug 2, 2018, at 4:56 PM, William Denniss > wrote: > […] > Major Comment: > > I support Mirja's DISCUSS. (Otherwise, this would be a DISCUSS), but I have a > slightly different spin on it. The dev

[OAUTH-WG] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-device-flow-11: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-device-flow-11: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

[OAUTH-WG] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-oauth-discovery-08: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-discovery-08: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https

[OAUTH-WG] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-native-apps-11: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-native-apps-11: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

[OAUTH-WG] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-12: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-12: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https

[OAUTH-WG] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-amr-values-05: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-amr-values-05: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

[OAUTH-WG] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-spop-12: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-spop-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https

[OAUTH-WG] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-introspection-09: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-introspection-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-27: (with COMMENT)

On 22 Apr 2015, at 18:35, Mike Jones wrote: I'd be fine adding the BCP 100 reference. I'd rather that we keep the early registration procedures language. That would work for me. -- Mike -Original Message----- From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@n

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-27: (with COMMENT)

On 21 Apr 2015, at 20:30, Justin Richer wrote: Ben et. al, We’ve incorporated feedback into the latest draft: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-28 I think that resolves all my comments save one: [...] 4.1 and