[OAUTH-WG] Re: Call for adoption - RFC7523bis

I’m in favor of adoption. Thanks, -dhs -- Dean H. Saxe, CIDPRO (he/him) Principal Engineer Office of the CTO Beyond Identity dean.s...@beyondidentity.com On Feb 6, 2025 at 8:36:36 AM, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > All, > > This is a call for adoption for the *RFC75

[OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - RFC7523bis

All, This is a call for adoption for the *RFC7523bis* draft that was discussed recently during the last interim meeting: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jones-oauth-rfc7523bis/ Remember that *adoption* does *not* mean a document is *finished*, only that it is an *acceptable starting point*

[OAUTH-WG] Comments on two closed issues on github about draft-ietf-oauth-status-list

As a box for comments was still available, I answered to two closed issues. So I wonder if they have been seen. The comments on these two closed issues are: a) *The term Issuer SHOULD NOT be used to refer to an entity acting "for all three roles #220* I am still not convinced that the role

[OAUTH-WG] Re: WGLC for Token Status List

Hi Rohan, thanks for your feedback. Answers are inline: On 06.02.25 02:21, Rohan Mahy wrote: Hi, I support the overall goals of this document. I do *not* think the document was ready for WGLC; at minimum there are still plenty of TBDs and TODOs in the text. Below are some comments: We do not h