[OAUTH-WG] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-v2-1-11.txt

2024-05-15 Thread torsten=40lodderstedt . net
Big +1 Am 16. Mai 2024, 03:14 +0200 schrieb Dick Hardt : > Thanks for driving this and making the changes Aaron! > > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 5:30 PM Aaron Parecki > > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Thanks for the productive discussion at the interim meeting today. I've > > > taken the feedba

[OAUTH-WG] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-v2-1-11.txt

2024-05-15 Thread Dick Hardt
Thanks for driving this and making the changes Aaron! On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 5:30 PM Aaron Parecki wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for the productive discussion at the interim meeting today. I've > taken the feedback and published a new version with all the changes > discussed. > > https://www.ietf

[OAUTH-WG] Re: Second WGLC for OAuth 2.0 Protected Resource Metadata

2024-05-15 Thread Michael Jones
Having addressed the first WGLC comments in -04 and adding a pretty diagram in -05, I believe this is ready for publication. Thanks, -- Mike From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef S

[OAUTH-WG] Second WGLC for OAuth 2.0 Protected Resource Metadata

2024-05-15 Thread Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
All, This is a *second* *WG Last Call* for the *OAuth 2.0 Protected Resource Metadata* document (the previous one was for v03.). https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-05.html Please, review this document and reply on the mailing list if you have any comments or concer

[OAUTH-WG] Re: [lamps] Revocation and OAuth

2024-05-15 Thread Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
Adding the OAuth WG to this thread. Regards, Rifaat On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 7:52 AM Carl Wallace wrote: > Here're a few questions/comments from a first read of > draft-ietf-oauth-status-list. Overall, the approach looks good to me. > > > > Should at least one of ttl and exp be required? Why i