Re: [OAUTH-WG] Review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid

2023-09-28 Thread Justin Richer
Hi Roman, The concerns of this document are largely specific to OpenID Connect, and not vanilla OAuth, but of course many of us in the community overlap and I’m happy to help provide some feedback here. I’m not familiar with RDAP, so if any of my concerns are addressed by other aspects of the R

[OAUTH-WG] PAR request_uri questions/guidance

2023-09-28 Thread Brock Allen
Hello -- While implementing PAR, some questions came up around the request_uri, expiration, and one-time use semantics. 1: I found this conversation:  https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/Xp5Wyt4N9U6RZZzMd6RctU3koQw/# [https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/Xp5Wyt4N9U6RZZzMd6RctU3ko

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid

2023-09-28 Thread Roman Danyliw
Hi! I deferred this document to Thursday, October 5 telechat. If anyone has time to review this document, it would be appreciated. Roman -Original Message- From: Roman Danyliw Sent: Friday, September 15, 2023 3:29 PM To: oauth Subject: Review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid Hi! I

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [External Sender] Re: Questions on OAuth Protected Resource Metadata

2023-09-28 Thread Warren Parad
> > the resulting consent dialog from Google is going to say "Apple is > requesting super admin privileges to your Apple account". And that's totally fine (also assuming you meant *to your google account*. But the second provider MUST also have a prompt to the delegation of those resources. That