Re: [OAUTH-WG] [External Sender] Re: Questions on OAuth Protected Resource Metadata

2023-09-26 Thread Tom Jones
Kind of interesting to consider this to be a security consideration. It depends on whose security is being considered. I have always thought that the only way for the subject to approach a request for data is as a privacy threat. The attacker is the "client" every time. Sometimes it is something at

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [External Sender] Re: Questions on OAuth Protected Resource Metadata

2023-09-26 Thread George Fletcher
Hi Justin, Whether the scopes are known or unknown to the developer, I don't think it changes the "attack vector" which is to get the client to request more privilege than it should in a given circumstance. Maybe the attacker has a way to capture the token once it issues (this of course can be mit

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Questions on OAuth Protected Resource Metadata

2023-09-26 Thread Justin Richer
I think we’re used to thinking of scopes in terms of things that a developer can read and understand, but that’s not always going to be true. For automated systems like this, the developer isn’t always expected to understand the scope — they probably don’t even see it in many cases. The client s