Re: [OAUTH-WG] [External Sender] Re: Call for adoption - SD-JWT-based Verifiable Credentials

I support adoption. Sent from my iPhoneOn Jul 30, 2023, at 8:22 AM, George Fletcher wrote:+1 for meOn Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 3:36 PM Michael Prorock wrote:I support adoption - but would request that if a group dedicated to verifiable credentials is created prior to this draft be

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication

I support adoption. From: OAuth On Behalf Of Rifaat Shekh-Yusef Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2023 12:27 PM To: oauth Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication All, This is an official call for adoption for the Attestation-Based Client Authentication draft dis

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - SD-JWT-based Verifiable Credentials

I support adoption. From: OAuth On Behalf Of Rifaat Shekh-Yusef Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2023 12:25 PM To: oauth Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - SD-JWT-based Verifiable Credentials All, This is an official call for adoption for the SD-JWT-based Verifiable Credentials draft discussed i

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - SD-JWT-based Verifiable Credentials

I'm an editor and I support adoption as well :) On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 8:13 AM Shigeya Suzuki wrote: > I support adoption. > > shigeya > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2023, at 04:25, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > > All, > > This is an official call for adoption for the *SD-JWT-based Verifiable > Credentials *

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [External Sender] Re: Feed back on draft-sh-rats-oidc at-00

Hi Ned, I'm not sure how best to thread any responses... Regarding terminology and definitions: I agree that this should be done and be added to whatever document(s) are adopted by the working group. In general, I suspect that within the OAuth working group "attestation" is a general term describ