[OAUTH-WG] (no subject)

___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Feed back on draft-sh-rats-oidc at-00

George, Thanks for the detailed responses. I have a few questions / comments inline. Thanks, Ned From: George Fletcher Date: Friday, July 28, 2023 at 11:47 AM To: "Smith, Ned" , Thomas Hardjono , "oauth@ietf.org" Subject: Feed back on draft-sh-rats-oidc at-00 Hi Ned/Thomas, Thanks so much for

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Digest, Vol 177, Issue 24

ur GitHub page to track this. Best regards, Paul -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/attachments/20230728/148306c2/attachment.htm> -- Message: 2 Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 08:16:30 -0700 Fro

[OAUTH-WG] Feed back on draft-sh-rats-oidc at-00

Hi Ned/Thomas, Thanks so much for the conversation at IETF on the potential value of combining the attestation work with OpenID Connect and OAuth. Given the spec references a lot of OpenID Connect artifacts, I’ve used OpenID Connect points in this response. However, from an IETF perspective, this

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Attestation-Based Client Authentication

Hello Tom, Here is a link to the slide deck from IIW: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/paul-bastian-1970b1195_slides-on-wallet-security-concepts-activity-7056179875635724289-pDXM?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android Some things have evolved from there and this IETF draft is one of them. I am