Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Issues
Summary: essentially ready but with issues to consider before being published
as a proposed standard RFC.
Thanks for addressing the nit from my previous review.
I am not convinced that the document doesn't need more discussion around the
p
On 3/2/23 3:51 PM, Vittorio Bertocci wrote:
Hi Robert,
thanks for your comments!
Some of the ideas you mention here were also touched upon during the
AD review w Roman, the exchange we had might provide some context
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/PBDCtVB7vtou5Dlz6nPJxX_5Yyo/
but
