Thanks Justin,
It'll be fixed in the next draft revision. I happened to notice the
oversight as well when working on the AD review and have already added it
in the document source in github.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 3:44 PM Justin Richer wrote:
> DPoP Authors:
>
> I just noticed that the DPoP-No
DPoP Authors:
I just noticed that the DPoP-Nonce header is not registered in the current
version of the DPoP spec. This should be added under section 12.8, HTTP Message
Header Field Names Registration. It’s a clerical oversight but needs to be
fixed before the document is finalized.
— Justin
Thanks, Brian!
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 3:52 PM Brian Campbell
wrote:
> It's just an aspect of generally flexible/configurable products so there
> aren't documents that specifically call out support. That I'm aware of
> anyway. I'm admittedly not terribly familiar with our documentation. But I
>
It's just an aspect of generally flexible/configurable products so there
aren't documents that specifically call out support. That I'm aware of
anyway. I'm admittedly not terribly familiar with our documentation. But I
found a couple things. LIke this
https://docs.pingidentity.com/r/en-us/pingacces
Thanks Brian!
Any links to public documents that cover this that you could share?
Thanks,
Rifaat
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 8:39 AM Brian Campbell
wrote:
> Ping Identity has implementations of the functionality in this document
> for the authorization server and resource server roles.
>
> On Tu
Ping Identity has implementations of the functionality in this document for
the authorization server and resource server roles.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 6:16 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
wrote:
> All,
>
> As part of the shepherd write-up for the OAuth 2.0 Step-up Authentication
> Challenge Protocol docu
All,
As part of the shepherd write-up for the OAuth 2.0 Step-up Authentication
Challenge Protocol document,
we are looking for information about implementations of this draft.
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-08.html
Please, reply to this email, on the mai
I am not aware of any IPR associated with this document.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 6:11 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
wrote:
> Authors,
>
> As part of the shepherd write-up, all authors of OAuth 2.0 Step-up
> Authentication Challenge Protocol
> must confirm that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures req
Authors,
As part of the shepherd write-up, all authors of OAuth 2.0 Step-up
Authentication Challenge Protocol
must confirm that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full
conformance with the provisions
of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have been filed.
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-iet
