[OAUTH-WG] Protocol Action: 'OAuth 2.0 Pushed Authorization Requests' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-oauth-par-10.txt)

2021-07-29 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'OAuth 2.0 Pushed Authorization Requests' (draft-ietf-oauth-par-10.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Web Authorization Protocol Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Benjamin Kaduk and Roman Danyliw. A URL of thi

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Finals nits on draft-ietf-oauth-par

2021-07-29 Thread Roman Danyliw
Hi Brian! Thanks for this quick revision. I’ve advanced the doc out of the IESG. Congrats we’re almost there! Roman From: Brian Campbell Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 6:51 PM To: Roman Danyliw ; Murray Kucherawy Cc: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Finals nits on draft-ietf-oauth-par

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Finals nits on draft-ietf-oauth-par

2021-07-29 Thread Brian Campbell
and the new draft has been spun https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/IoeHrompr78jKeXInsHNGXg1IjE/ The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-par/ There is also an HTML version available at: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-iet

[OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-par-10.txt

2021-07-29 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol WG of the IETF. Title : OAuth 2.0 Pushed Authorization Requests Authors : Torsten Lodderstedt Br

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Finals nits on draft-ietf-oauth-par

2021-07-29 Thread Brian Campbell
Apologies, I somehow missed the email with Murray's ballot comments. I'd like to blame datatracker but just looked in the mail archive and there it is https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/Lvlk5kgi0NZS3W5mKSBb7r3ASPM/ so it must have been my mistake somewhere. Comments 1 and 3 are addressed

[OAUTH-WG] Finals nits on draft-ietf-oauth-par

2021-07-29 Thread Roman Danyliw
Hi! Thanks for the -08 version of draft-ietf-oauth-par and the associated discussion in response to the IESG review. Can you please spin a quick editorial revision to catch Murray's comments and respond to his question on Section 7.3. See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-par