Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7519 (6622)

2021-06-25 Thread John R. Levine
Htmlized legacy RFCs are created by a script that uses heuristics to add formatting to the canonical text document. One of the limitations of the script is that it does not know when a section link is to another document. For RFCs published since we switched to XML v3 two years ago, the HTML i

Re: [OAUTH-WG] RAR WGLC comment

2021-06-25 Thread Justin Richer
I agree with this change, but with one caveat (already expressed in the PR) that an AS should be aware that clients can now send scope, resource, and authorization_details parameters together on a single request. It’s not up to RAR to define how all of those fit together, but an AS implementing

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (6613)

2021-06-25 Thread Justin Richer
I personally agree with this report, the new proposed wording is better. OAuth 2.1 editors, please take note! — Justin > On Jun 22, 2021, at 8:01 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > This looks correct to me; could the authors/WG please confirm? > > Thanks, > > Ben > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 12:

[OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7519 (6622)

2021-06-25 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7519, "JSON Web Token (JWT)". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6622 -- Type: Editorial Reported by: Padmanarayanan SR Sect