Re: [OAUTH-WG] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-30

2021-02-28 Thread Watson Ladd
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 12:54 PM Mike Jones wrote: > > Thanks again for your review, Watson. My replies to your comments below are > prefixed by "Mike>". Thank you for the work on the draft. I've removed places where we agree in the interest of readability, so the result may be more contentious

Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating OAuth, oops

2021-02-28 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021, at 19:22, Seán Kelleher wrote: > Just to clarify, I assume in this discourse that the "server" in this client > and server relationship refers to an AS/RS pair in OAuth terminology? Based > on this, one big sticking point for me on the applicability of NxM, or even > 1xM,