Hello Dick!
Unless the two typos that I have mentioned should be updated beforehand ,
no, I do not.
Thank you,
Sascha
On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 16:36, Dick Hardt wrote:
> Thanks Sascha and Vladimir for the feedback!
>
> Sascha: did you have a concern with the document being adopted by the WG?
>
>
Thanks Sascha and Vladimir for the feedback!
Sascha: did you have a concern with the document being adopted by the WG?
ᐧ
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 4:04 PM Sascha Preibisch
wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Here is the rest of my feedback. At the end I also included a list of
> typos and the summary of changes
Hi all!
Here is the rest of my feedback. At the end I also included a list of
typos and the summary of changes that I have found between RFC 6739
and the current draft.
Regards,
Sascha
Section 2.3. Client Authentication
-
Draft and current:
- both documents contain this
I find 03 well structured, well written and it shows that a lot of
thought and work has gone into it.
If this is a formal call for adoption - I support it.
> - defined new client type - credentialed clients - a client that has
> credentials, but the AS has not confirmed the identity of the clien
On 06/07/2020 19:32, Neil Madden wrote:
> I’m reading draft-ietf-oauth-rar-01 in a bit more detail now I have
> some time, and I have a few comments.
>
> An assumption in the draft appears to be that the client knows ahead
> of time what it wants to gain access to and can describe it in detail.
>
