Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 for Browser-Based Apps - On the usefulness of refresh token rotation

2020-05-16 Thread Vittorio Bertocci
> logout at the authorization server One important detail here is that if the refresh token has been obtained by including the scope "offline_access", then its lifetime should not be tied to the lifetime of the session (see https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html#OfflineAccess), h

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 for Browser-Based Apps - On the usefulness of refresh token rotation

2020-05-16 Thread Philippe De Ryck
Hi Torsten, > On 16 May 2020, at 19:50, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote: > > Hi Philippe, > >> On 16. May 2020, at 17:08, Philippe De Ryck >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I am working on formulating developer guidelines on using Refresh Token >> Rotation (RTR), as required by "OAuth 2.0 for Brows

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 for Browser-Based Apps - On the usefulness of refresh token rotation

2020-05-16 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
Hi Philippe, > On 16. May 2020, at 17:08, Philippe De Ryck > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am working on formulating developer guidelines on using Refresh Token > Rotation (RTR), as required by "OAuth 2.0 for Browser-Based Apps". > > The protection offered by RTR kicks in the moment a refresh t

[OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 for Browser-Based Apps - On the usefulness of refresh token rotation

2020-05-16 Thread Philippe De Ryck
Hi all, I am working on formulating developer guidelines on using Refresh Token Rotation (RTR), as required by "OAuth 2.0 for Browser-Based Apps". The protection offered by RTR kicks in the moment a refresh token is used twice, so the assumption is that the attacker has the ability to steal to