Re: [OAUTH-WG] Transaction Authorization with OAuth

2019-05-16 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
> Am 10.05.2019 um 22:27 schrieb George Fletcher : > > One thing to keep in mind with the "Push Request Object" model and the > concept of a more detailed scope structure, if the specified values are not > for a single transaction, then the AS will be required to keep the "Pushed > Request Ob

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Query on RFC 7591 - dynamic client registration protocol

2019-05-16 Thread Phil Hunt
We looked at giving clients a public client id they could use to perform an authorize with scope “dcr” to get an AT to be used as an IAT. While it works it seems like overkill. The main risk with the DCR endpoint is generating too many IDs ... a DoS issue primarily since having an ID is not au

[OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-18.txt

2019-05-16 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol WG of the IETF. Title : The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework: JWT Secured Authorization Request (JAR) Authors : Nat Saki

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Query on RFC 7591 - dynamic client registration protocol

2019-05-16 Thread Sahler, Frank
Hi Justin, background of my query is that we want to offer in our company the possibility of dynamic client registration. Unfortunately, the topic initial access token - how do I get it and how exactly it is constructed - is not exactly specified - it is out of scope. That is the reason why I sea