Thanks Denis!
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 7:37 AM, William Denniss wrote:
> Thanks all for the great discussion. I tweaked the discussion on
> public/confidential clients to rely more on the OAuth2 definition (it was a
> bit duplicative), and I reordered the security considerations so it flows
> bett
A BCP is still assigned a RFC number.
The intent is to have BCP number as well.
EG BCP195’s current instance is RFC 7525.
The intent is to have a BCP series but the process is largely the same as I
understand it.
John B.
> On Mar 4, 2017, at 3:10 PM, Torsten Lodderstedt
> wrote:
>
> H
