Re: [OAUTH-WG] Following up on token exchange use case

2016-09-09 Thread Brian Campbell
Despite not fully following all of that, I would like to try and understand if there are reasonable changes that could be made to accommodate what you're looking for. What if we changed the subject_token parameter from REQUIRED to OPTIONAL and then require at least one of subject_token or actor_to

[OAUTH-WG] “amr” Values specification addressing WGLC comments

2016-09-09 Thread Mike Jones
Draft -02 of the Authentication Method Reference Values specification addresses the Working Group Last Call (WGLC) comments received. It adds an example to the multiple-channel authentication description and moves the “amr” definition into the introduction. No normative changes were made. The

[OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-amr-values-02.txt

2016-09-09 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol of the IETF. Title : Authentication Method Reference Values Authors : Michael B. Jones Phil Hunt