Hi Hannes,
Am 02.03.2015 um 16:31 schrieb Hannes Tschofenig:
Hi all,
I am trying to finalize my work on the shepherd write-up of
draft-ietf-oauth-spop.
Unfortunately, there are still some outstanding issues:
1. S256 as a mandatory-to-implement code challenge method
(by the Authorization Serve
The IESG has received a request from the Web Authorization Protocol WG
(oauth) to consider the following document:
- 'OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration Protocol'
as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please
Hi,
I'd like to see if we can get last call started on this one soon.
My questions are not all specific to this draft and I won't hold up this
draft for answers that are broader.
For this one, if the duplicate TLS text can be addressed, that would be
helpful.
Then, I'll also need to know more o
Thank you, I just reviewed the diff and the changes to the draft look good.
Best regards,
Kathleen
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Justin Richer wrote:
> John’s assessment is correct and this is what we’ve tried to capture in
> the privacy considerations section of the latest draft:
>
>In
Thank you, Hannes.
I'll do a quick review of changes and if everything looks good, I'll start
IETF last call.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Hannes Tschofenig <
hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have updated the shepherd write-up for version 24 of the dynamic
> client registrat
Hi all,
I am trying to finalize my work on the shepherd write-up of
draft-ietf-oauth-spop.
Unfortunately, there are still some outstanding issues:
1. S256 as a mandatory-to-implement code challenge method
(by the Authorization Server)
Currently, S256 is MTI but implementations do not use S256 (
Hi all,
I have updated the shepherd write-up for version 24 of the dynamic
client registration protocol. The update concerned the clarification of
the copyright situation initially raised with this mail:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg13322.html
It turned out that it was be