[OAUTH-WG] Reaction to the current assertion pair {framework, SAML}

>> Any idea, on the two Assertion Documents, if there is or will be any >> feedback from the IESG and, if so, what form it might take? > > I'm sorry that I haven't been able to get to reviewing this yet -- > I've had a bunch of pre-IETF travel, in addition to preparing for the > meeting. I aim to

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft Agenda

> Any idea, on the two Assertion Documents, if there is or will be any > feedback from the IESG and, if so, what form it might take? I'm sorry that I haven't been able to get to reviewing this yet -- I've had a bunch of pre-IETF travel, in addition to preparing for the meeting. I aim to have a lo

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth + Open ID Connect Meeting: Sunday, March 2

On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, John Bradley wrote: I asked for the room from 12 to 5. The chair had the time changed so we reserved the room from 10 to 3pm. We would need to talk to Lucy to see if we could have the time extended past 3 for additional OAuth related meetings. I don't know if the room

[OAUTH-WG] Please remove me from mailing list - Thank you

Please remove me from mailing list - Thank you ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft Agenda

Any idea, on the two Assertion Documents, if there is or will be any feedback from the IESG and, if so, what form it might take? There's a chance #2 takes considerably less than 15 minutes, if there's no feedback. And hopefully 15 mins will be sufficient, if there is some feedback. On Mon, Feb 24,