No comments - everything is fine
"Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" schrieb:
>Hi again,
>
>I also checked the minutes from IETF#87 regarding the JWT and here are
>the action items:
>
>** I issued a WGLC, as discussed during the meeting:
>http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/ms
Regarding the second item about additional SAML related text - such
text already exists in the document in ยง5 [quoted and linked below].
It's unclear to me what else is being asked for here?
I'd like to request that some specific and concrete text be proposed,
if anyone believes the current wordin
Hi all,
I am trying to wrap up the assertion documents and I took a look at the meeting
minutes from the Berlin IETF meeting and the actions are as follows:
** John & Torsten: Please post your document review to the list.
** Authors of draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer: Please provide the addition
Hi again,
I also checked the minutes from IETF#87 regarding the JWT and here are the
action items:
** I issued a WGLC, as discussed during the meeting:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg11894.html
** We got some reviews from James, and Prateek. Thanks, guys!
Here are the
