Re: [OAUTH-WG] Registration endpoints? (was: Re: Concerning OAuth )

2013-01-31 Thread Todd W Lainhart
> We should not conflate with OAuth core framework requirements and protected resource requirements. +1 Todd Lainhart Rational software IBM Corporation 550 King Street, Littleton, MA 01460-1250 1-978-899-4705 2-276-4705 (T/L) lainh...@us.ibm.com From: Nat Sakimura To: Mike Jones

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Registration endpoints? (was: Re: Concerning OAuth )

2013-01-31 Thread Todd W Lainhart
We implemented our dynamic client registration along the lines that Nat describes, except that the resource segment and not the query parm identifies the client. The POST and the GET on the collection return the resource identifiers (HATEOS). Query parms on the collection GET works as you mig

Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-richer-oauth-introspection-01 scope syntax

2013-01-31 Thread Todd W Lainhart
I would vote for consistency with 6749 - string tokenizing doesn't seem like a big deal, esp. since clients are going to have to deal with it when scopes are returned from the token endpoint. It was raised here when I realized that we would have to give clients two types of guidance when deali

Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-richer-oauth-introspection-01 scope syntax

2013-01-31 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi Justin On 30/01/13 22:29, Justin Richer wrote: It's not meant to follow the same syntax. Instead, it's making use of the JSON object structure to avoid additional parsing of the values on the client side. We could fairly easily define it as the same space-delimited string if enough people wan