Re: [OAUTH-WG] Change in editorship of OAuth Core Spec

2012-07-23 Thread Aiden Bell
Thanks Eran, can't be an easy job :) On 23 July 2012 18:20, John Bradley wrote: > I also want to thank Eran for all of his work. > > We would not have OAuth without his contributions. > > John B. > On 2012-07-23, at 1:14 PM, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote: > > +1 > > > > Peter Saint-Andre schrieb: >

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Change in editorship of OAuth Core Spec

2012-07-23 Thread John Bradley
I also want to thank Eran for all of his work. We would not have OAuth without his contributions. John B. On 2012-07-23, at 1:14 PM, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote: > +1 > > > > Peter Saint-Andre schrieb: > Indeed. Many thanks to Eran! > > On 7/23/12 11:08 AM, Brian Campbell wrote: > > +1 > > >

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Change in editorship of OAuth Core Spec

2012-07-23 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
+1 Peter Saint-Andre schrieb: Indeed. Many thanks to Eran! On 7/23/12 11:08 AM, Brian Campbell wrote: > +1 > > Well said Justin. And thank you Eran. > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Richer, Justin P. wrote: Eran Hammer has decided to step down as Editor of the OAuth Core spe

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Change in editorship of OAuth Core Spec

2012-07-23 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Indeed. Many thanks to Eran! On 7/23/12 11:08 AM, Brian Campbell wrote: > +1 > > Well said Justin. And thank you Eran. > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Richer, Justin P. wrote: Eran Hammer has decided to step down as Editor of the OAuth Core specification. I would like to person

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Change in editorship of OAuth Core Spec

2012-07-23 Thread Brian Campbell
+1 Well said Justin. And thank you Eran. On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Richer, Justin P. wrote: >>> Eran Hammer has decided to step down as Editor of the OAuth Core >>> specification. I would like to personally thank Eran for all his years >>> of hard work and effort to the draft as well as

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Change in editorship of OAuth Core Spec

2012-07-23 Thread Richer, Justin P.
>> Eran Hammer has decided to step down as Editor of the OAuth Core >> specification. I would like to personally thank Eran for all his years >> of hard work and effort to the draft as well as to the working group at >> large. > > As former chair, I want to add my thanks. Eran has done a *lot* o

[OAUTH-WG] Document Action: 'An IETF URN Sub-Namespace for OAuth' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-06.txt)

2012-07-23 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'An IETF URN Sub-Namespace for OAuth' (draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-06.txt) as Informational RFC This document is the product of the Web Authorization Protocol Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Stephen Farrell and Sean Turner. A URL of t

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested

2012-07-23 Thread Thomas Hardjono
Hannes, Derek, Would it possible to postpone presentation/discussion of the Dyn-Reg draft (Dynamic Client Registration Protocol) to the Atlanta/November IETF meeting? The reason is that none of the proposers will be attending the Vancouver IETF in-person. Thanks. /thomas/ _

[OAUTH-WG] No design team call today

2012-07-23 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
given the IETF meeting next week. Please read through the WG documents to be properly prepared. Ciao Hannes ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Re: [OAUTH-WG] oauth-bearer and rfc 2617/httpbis authentication framework

2012-07-23 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Thank you Stephen for getting this RFC Editor note in. On Jul 23, 2012, at 1:33 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'd like to check that some recent minor changes to this > document [1] don't cause technical or process-grief. > > The version [2] of the oauth bearer draft that underwe

Re: [OAUTH-WG] oauth-bearer and rfc 2617/httpbis authentication framework

2012-07-23 Thread Stephen Farrell
Hiya, On 07/23/2012 08:56 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2012-07-23 00:33, Stephen Farrell wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to check that some recent minor changes to this >> document [1] don't cause technical or process-grief. >> >> The version [2] of the oauth bearer draft that underwent >>

Re: [OAUTH-WG] oauth-bearer and rfc 2617/httpbis authentication framework

2012-07-23 Thread Julian Reschke
On 2012-07-23 00:33, Stephen Farrell wrote: Hi all, I'd like to check that some recent minor changes to this document [1] don't cause technical or process-grief. The version [2] of the oauth bearer draft that underwent IETF LC and IESG evaluation had a normative dependency on the httpbis wg's