Re: [OAUTH-WG] Section 7.2

2012-06-16 Thread Mike Jones
OK - will do. From: Eran Hammer Sent: 6/16/2012 12:43 PM To: Mike Jones; oauth@ietf.org WG (oauth@ietf.org) Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] Section 7.2 I would rather these restrictions be in the error registry section below and add a forward reference from 7.2. EH Fro

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Section 7.2

2012-06-16 Thread Eran Hammer
I would rather these restrictions be in the error registry section below and add a forward reference from 7.2. EH From: Mike Jones [mailto:michael.jo...@microsoft.com] Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 12:17 PM To: Eran Hammer; oauth@ietf.org WG (oauth@ietf.org) Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] Section 7.2

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Section 7.2

2012-06-16 Thread Mike Jones
While adding the new text into a proposed draft, I realized that no character set restrictions on the error code values were defined in the agreed text. Therefore, I've added the following sentence (which was already present in -27): Values for these error codes MUST NOT include

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Report an authentication issue

2012-06-16 Thread Kristofor Selden
Nov demonstrated the problem to us at Yapp and we used solution 4 (because the solution is server side and our app was in the app store). FB Connect is authentication and authorization, where OAuth 2 is concerned only with authorization – I'm not sure that app developers appreciate this subtlety