FYI. Updated version of UMA Core draft.
__
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 1:22 PM
To: Thomas Hardjono
Cc: Thomas Hardjono
Subject: New Version Notification for dr
Hello,
I've developed a set of flow diagrams for the OAuth 2.0 spec, with separate
diagrams for the Access Code, Implicit Grant, Resource Owner Password
Credentials, and the Client Credentials flows. These were inspired by the
diagrams for 1.0 and 1.0a that Idan Gazit posted in
http://www.ietf
That looks fine to me fwiw,
Thanks,
S.
On 02/03/2012 01:14 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
On 31/01/2012 10:33, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
On 30/01/2012 05:20, Mike Jones wrote:
[...]
About your third minor issue on RFC 6125 versus RFC 2818, you'll find
that, per the history entries, a previous refer
On 31/01/2012 10:33, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
On 30/01/2012 05:20, Mike Jones wrote:
[...]
About your third minor issue on RFC 6125 versus RFC 2818, you'll find
that, per the history entries, a previous reference to RFC 2818 was
changed to RFC 6125 in draft 14 at the request of Security Area
D
