Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Bearer authentication - for proxies?

2011-12-30 Thread Amos Jeffries
re-posting for cc to OAuth WG On 25/12/2011 7:21 p.m., Amos Jeffries wrote: On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 08:46:45 -0500, Mark Nottingham wrote: The OAUTH WG is creating a new authentication scheme for bearer tokens: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-15 Reading section 2.3, it ap

Re: [OAUTH-WG] auth-param syntax, was: OK to post OAuth Bearer draft 15?

2011-12-30 Thread Mike Jones
I did already back the statement that this is the working group consensus with the e-mails attached in this note sent to you on December 12, 2011: - http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg08042.html But since that apparently wasn't convincing to you that this working group decis

[OAUTH-WG] Error code for access token request

2011-12-30 Thread Antonio Sanso
Hi *, Error response for Authorization Request defines some kind of server error code response: server_error The authorization server encountered an unexpected condition which prevented it from fulfilling the request. as in [0]. I was wondering if would be possi

Re: [OAUTH-WG] auth-param syntax, was: OK to post OAuth Bearer draft 15?

2011-12-30 Thread Julian Reschke
On 2011-12-29 22:18, Mike Jones wrote: You proposed, Julian "3. Do not specify the ABNF. The ABNF of the WWW-Authenticate is defined in HTTPbis. Just state the names of the parameters, their syntax *after* parsing and their semantics." About some of Mark Nottingham's comments, Barry wrote "Let