Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last call comments on bearer draft 08 from Yaron Goland

Thanks for your comments, Yaron. Responses to them, which reflect the content of draft 09, follow inline. -- Mike From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mike Jones Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 201

Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-08 HTTP syntax comments

Thanks for your comments, Julian. Responses to them, which reflect the content of draft 09, follow inline. -- Mike -Original Message- From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julian Reschk

Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-08.txt WGLC comments

Thanks for your comments, James. Responses to them, which reflect the content of draft 09, follow inline. -- Mike -Original Message- From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Manger, James

Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-08 HTTP syntax comments

Thanks for your comment, Peter. Done. Is there any estimated timeline for publication of the HTTPbis specs as RFCs? -- Mike -Original Message- From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pet

[OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token Specification Draft -09

Draft 09 of the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token Specification has been published, which incorporates Working Group Last Call feedback. It contains the following changes: ·

[OAUTH-WG] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-09.txt

-Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 5:07 PM To: Mike Jones Cc: Mike Jones; d...@fb.com; dick.ha...@gmail.com Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-09.txt A new version of I-D, dra

[OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-09.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol Working Group of the IETF. Title : The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol: Bearer Tokens Author(s) : Michael B. Jones

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lodderstedt-oauth-revocation-03.txt

Yes, this is high time to have this a WG item! Igor On 9/16/2011 3:32 PM, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote: Hi all, I just published a new revision of the token revocation draft. We added JSONP support (thanks to Marius) and aligned the text with draft 21 of the core spec. We would like to bring

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Bearer token credentials syntax

+1.1 On 2011-09-23, at 7:00 AM, Mike Jones wrote: > James Manger and others pointed out that the current credentials syntax does > not comply with RFC 2617, nor does it match the updated credentials syntax > contained in HTTPbis, part 7: Authentication. The current syntax in the > bearer toke

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lodderstedt-oauth-revocation-03.txt

+1 Huilan Lu From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marius Scurtescu Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 2:48 PM To: Chuck Mortimore Cc: OAuth WG Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lodderstedt-oauth-revocation-03.txt +1 On Fri, Sep 1

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Bearer token credentials syntax

+1 Phil @independentid www.independentid.com phil.h...@oracle.com On 2011-09-23, at 7:00 AM, Mike Jones wrote: > James Manger and others pointed out that the current credentials syntax does > not comply with RFC 2617, nor does it match the updated credentials syntax > contained in HTTPbis

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Bearer token credentials syntax

+1 On 2011-09-23, at 11:00 AM, Mike Jones wrote: > James Manger and others pointed out that the current credentials syntax does > not comply with RFC 2617, nor does it match the updated credentials syntax > contained in HTTPbis, part 7: Authentication. The current syntax in the > bearer token

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Bearer token credentials syntax

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Mike Jones wrote: > James Manger and others pointed out that the current credentials syntax does > not comply with RFC 2617, nor does it match the updated credentials syntax > contained in HTTPbis, part 7: Authentication.  The current syntax in the > bearer token d

[OAUTH-WG] Bearer token credentials syntax

James Manger and others pointed out that the current credentials syntax does not comply with RFC 2617, nor does it match the updated credentials syntax contained in HTTPbis, part 7: Authentication. The current syntax in the bearer token

[OAUTH-WG] Proposed resolution for issue 26

Issue #26 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/oauth/trac/ticket/26 asks whether the semantics of scope strings should be changed to require that the % character be interpreted as introducing a percent-encoded character that follows. My proposed resolution is that %-encoding not be required in the spe

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Publication requested for draft-ietf-oauth-v2-22

Thanks Barry and all for getting this to this stage. I'll get you my AD review as soon as I can (though I'll be out of contact next week). We can then kick off the IETF LC assuming all's well. Cheers, S. On 09/22/2011 02:48 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: Stephen, The OAuth working group requests publi