There wasn't a vote. Just call for feedback and so far I haven't seen consensus.
EHL
> -Original Message-
> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Phil Hunt
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 3:11 PM
> To: OAuth WG
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Hum about
Is there anything proposed yet?
Phil
phil.h...@oracle.com
On 2011-02-10, at 3:14 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> It seems that this group probably could have a productive meeting in
> Prague. This is just a reminder that the deadline for requesting a slot
> is next Monday, February 14. :)
>
>
It seems that this group probably could have a productive meeting in
Prague. This is just a reminder that the deadline for requesting a slot
is next Monday, February 14. :)
http://www.ietf.org/meeting/cutoff-dates-2011.html#IETF80
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
De
I never heard a final resolution to this. What was the vote result?
Phil
phil.h...@oracle.com
On 2011-02-10, at 3:07 PM, Marius Scurtescu wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Hannes Tschofenig
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Eran suggested to remove the Client Assertion functionality from t
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Hannes Tschofenig
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Eran suggested to remove the Client Assertion functionality from the
> draft-ietf-oauth-v2 specification in his mail from last month:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg05027.html
>
> This lead to a heated
