Re: [OAUTH-WG] unregistered applications

2010-12-23 Thread Francisco Corella
Hi Marius, Thank you very much for your detailed reading of the paper and your very useful comments.  I've revised the paper based on your comments and put a new version online, with an acknowledgment of your contribution. > PKAuth seems similar to OAuth 2, I think it would help if you used the s

Re: [OAUTH-WG] unregistered applications

2010-12-23 Thread Marius Scurtescu
Hi Francisco, PKAuth seems similar to OAuth 2, I think it would help if you used the same terminology: - application => client - social site => authorization server - client => end user - reference code => authorization code The paper claims that users do not know how to interpret domain names, w

Re: [OAUTH-WG] expires_at vs expires_in

2010-12-23 Thread Marius Scurtescu
This expiration time is just a hint, client code should work perfectly fine without it, or with a wrong one. Trying to understand the use case here: JavaScript code receives an access token and the associated expires_in. It passes the access token to backend code, and this backend code is properly

Re: [OAUTH-WG] expires_at vs expires_in

2010-12-23 Thread Olivier POITREY
You can't access it from JavaScript in most use-cases unfortunately. It's why having both expires_in and expires_at would be nice. On 23 déc. 2010, at 11:36, "Pelle Wessman" mailto:pe...@kodfabrik.se>> wrote: For the Web Server flow you will have a HTTP Date header containing the timestamp at

Re: [OAUTH-WG] expires_at vs expires_in

2010-12-23 Thread Pelle Wessman
For the Web Server flow you will have a HTTP Date header containing the timestamp at which the token was generated - right? Combining the value of that header with expires_in will get you the value of expires_at. / Pelle On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Paul Walker wrote: > Has there been disc