Re: [OAUTH-WG] First draft of OAuth 2.0

2010-03-21 Thread David Recordon
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Eve Maler wrote: > Selected thoughts in response: > > On 21 Mar 2010, at 3:51 PM, David Recordon wrote: > >> Thanks!  Comments inline and updated the repo >> (http://github.com/daveman692/OAuth-2.0/commit/3193098ff45168dd0a65456334428b20215f848a). >> >> On Sun, Mar

Re: [OAUTH-WG] First draft of OAuth 2.0

2010-03-21 Thread Eve Maler
Selected thoughts in response: On 21 Mar 2010, at 3:51 PM, David Recordon wrote: > Thanks! Comments inline and updated the repo > (http://github.com/daveman692/OAuth-2.0/commit/3193098ff45168dd0a65456334428b20215f848a). > > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Eve Maler wrote: >> David, great stu

Re: [OAUTH-WG] First draft of OAuth 2.0

2010-03-21 Thread Eve Maler
On 21 Mar 2010, at 1:43 PM, David Recordon wrote: > The goal of the, "the authorization server advertises (such as via > documentation) the URIs of the following three endpoints" wording was to > allow for a discovery process that is defined separately from this spec. Is > that unclear? Have

Re: [OAUTH-WG] First draft of OAuth 2.0

2010-03-21 Thread David Recordon
The goal of the, "the authorization server advertises (such as via documentation) the URIs of the following three endpoints" wording was to allow for a discovery process that is defined separately from this spec. Is that unclear? Have other words to propose? Eve, thanks for the detailed feedb

Re: [OAUTH-WG] First draft of OAuth 2.0

2010-03-21 Thread John Panzer
+1 to ensuring that dynamic introduction is possible. I see a lot of discussions that end up saying that this or that can be spec'd in the server docs and the client hard coded to the docs; this is fine for some features but not for very general ones that everybody needs to use. On Sunday, March

Re: [OAUTH-WG] First draft of OAuth 2.0

2010-03-21 Thread Eve Maler
David, great stuff -- thanks for putting this together! Here are a few comments and questions from a quick read on the plane down to Anaheim, in spec order (the weight/priority therefore varies widely). Abstract - "delegate": The use of this word seems like it's different from how it's been u

[OAUTH-WG] WebEx session info

2010-03-21 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Information about how to join via WebEx is here: http://www.ietf.org/meeting/77/webex.html The direct link for our session is quite long so I'd encourage you to click through from the URL above. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Sig

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Virtually Attending

2010-03-21 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Yes. I think I received the details overnight so I will post those as soon as possible. On 3/21/10 9:47 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote: > Hi Blaine, > > will it be possible for everyone to attend the meeting via webex? > > regards, > Torsten. >> Hi all, >> >> just a heads up that events have cons

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Virtually Attending

2010-03-21 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
Hi Blaine, will it be possible for everyone to attend the meeting via webex? regards, Torsten. Hi all, just a heads up that events have conspired such that I won't be at the meeting in person, but will be participating via webex. Peter will be present, and with his forthcoming appointment as A

[OAUTH-WG] Virtually Attending

2010-03-21 Thread Blaine Cook
Hi all, just a heads up that events have conspired such that I won't be at the meeting in person, but will be participating via webex. Peter will be present, and with his forthcoming appointment as Apps Area Director, will be imbued with the moderating powers of ten ordinary Chairs (as if he wasn'