This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
reschke pushed a change to branch OAK-10882
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit-oak.git
was 6cd5fb9641 OAK-10882: move Oak related notification from
d...@jackrabbit.apache.org to oak-dev@jackrabbit
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
reschke pushed a change to branch OAK-10876b
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit-oak.git
from c7f3cd3f6c OAK-10876: Oak 1.22 does not compile with JDK 11 anymore -
remove animal sniffer plugin, requ
kwin commented on code in PR #1523:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1523#discussion_r1638409418
##
oak-parent/pom.xml:
##
@@ -71,12 +71,15 @@
2.16.2
1.19.0
2.5.23
-1.8
-java18
-
-
+8
+${javaTargetVersion}
+${javaTarget
reschke commented on code in PR #1523:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1523#discussion_r1638410783
##
oak-parent/pom.xml:
##
@@ -71,12 +71,15 @@
2.16.2
1.19.0
2.5.23
-1.8
-java18
-
-
+8
+${javaTargetVersion}
+${javaTar
Hi,
Was it always the case that the “everyone" principal could not be resolved to
an Authorizable via
org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.UserManager.getAuthorizable()?
I found several places in AEM code where the return value of
UserManager.getAuthorizable(Principal) is unconditionally dere
The GitHub Actions job "SonarCloud" on jackrabbit-oak.git has failed.
Run started by GitHub user reschke (triggered by reschke).
Head commit for run:
db2db5989feade388dd42d40404e363a3cae8c41 / Julian Reschke
OAK-10882: move Oak related notification from d...@jackrabbit.apache.org to
oak-dev@ja
The GitHub Actions job "SonarCloud" on jackrabbit-oak.git has succeeded.
Run started by GitHub user nit0906 (triggered by nit0906).
Head commit for run:
791a3bd175196657506c1076ab471ff2d21bc2da / Nitin Gupta
Send existingRefCheckpoint in merge check
Report URL: https://github.com/apache/jackra
reschke commented on code in PR #1523:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1523#discussion_r1638395066
##
oak-parent/pom.xml:
##
@@ -71,12 +71,15 @@
2.16.2
1.19.0
2.5.23
-1.8
-java18
-
-
+8
+${javaTargetVersion}
+${javaTar
kwin commented on code in PR #1523:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1523#discussion_r1638397083
##
oak-parent/pom.xml:
##
@@ -71,12 +71,15 @@
2.16.2
1.19.0
2.5.23
-1.8
-java18
-
-
+8
+${javaTargetVersion}
+${javaTarget
kwin commented on PR #1523:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1523#issuecomment-2166019146
The readme needs to be adjusted as well:
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/tree/1.22?tab=readme-ov-file#getting-started
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Se
Hi Angela,
Thanks a lot for your input.
As it turned out in some instances the according “everyone" authorizable has
been removed by mistake and some code cannot deal with that (due to missing
null checks).
I am wondering though who Jackrabbit creates the “everyone” authorizable in the
first pla
reschke commented on code in PR #1523:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1523#discussion_r1638401362
##
oak-parent/pom.xml:
##
@@ -71,12 +71,15 @@
2.16.2
1.19.0
2.5.23
-1.8
-java18
-
-
+8
+${javaTargetVersion}
+${javaTar
I meanwhile found
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/trunk/oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/security/user/UserInitializer.java
which creates both the admin and the anonymous user, but haven’t found out yet
how “everyone” is being created.
> On 13. Jun 2024, at 19:30,
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
reschke pushed a change to branch OAK-10876b
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit-oak.git
from de946a9a2d OAK-10876: bump minimalBuildVersion to 11
add 7cb72a0fbe OAK-10876: adjust README
No new
stefan-egli commented on code in PR #1474:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1474#discussion_r1638425524
##
oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/version/VersionEditor.java:
##
@@ -145,27 +146,71 @@ public void propertyChanged(PropertyState be
Hi Konrad
There has been no change in that area for ages.
Oak out of the box does not mandate a Group 'everyone' to exist in the user
management. It will however always exist if you retrieve it through Principal
Manager in the default implementation. So,
*
every user/group accessible throug
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
reschke pushed a change to branch OAK-10876b
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit-oak.git
was 7cb72a0fbe OAK-10876: adjust README
The revisions that were on this branch are still contained in
other
reschke merged PR #1523:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1523
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: oak-dev-unsubscr...@jac
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
reschke pushed a commit to branch 1.22
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit-oak.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/1.22 by this push:
new 90383a8e3d OAK-10876: Oak 1.22 does not com
nit0906 commented on PR #1522:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1522#issuecomment-2166431495
@nfsantos - I took care of the grammar related issues in the logs.
I will try and answer the other questions here -
> the forceIndexLaneCatchup is not thread safe. Wh
I had looked into this and related code for something a while back, from what I
understood, everyone is not a user/group and is not created. there is code to
return EveryonePrincipal.getInstance(), whenever a user/group information is
requested.
e.g.
Tree authorizableTree = userProvider.get
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #581:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/581#issuecomment-2167063607
This PR is stale because it has been open 24 months with no activity. Remove
stale label or comment or this will be closed in 30 days.
--
This is an automated message f
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
reschke pushed a commit to branch trunk
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit-oak.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/trunk by this push:
new 229fc4b0d7 JCR-5072: Release Jackrabbit 2
Hi Konrad
As I said, Oak out of the box doesn't mandate a group representation of the
everyone principal to exist.
In AEM it is created with a content package (or repoinit) which results in a
regular call to UserManager.createGroup.
see also
https://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/security/use
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
reschke pushed a commit to branch trunk
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit-oak.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/trunk by this push:
new 06f54302a5 revert "JCR-5072: Release Jack
The GitHub Actions job "SonarCloud" on jackrabbit-oak.git has failed.
Run started by GitHub user reschke (triggered by reschke).
Head commit for run:
229fc4b0d7436f59638a77a1ae0dbdf48aaeb056 / Julian Reschke
JCR-5072: Release Jackrabbit 2.22.0 - update site
Report URL: https://github.com/apac
26 matches
Mail list logo
