anchela merged PR #1851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1851
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: oak-dev-unsubscr...@jac
anchela commented on PR #1851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1851#issuecomment-2514621403
yep
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubs
reschke commented on PR #1851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1851#issuecomment-2511230488
@anchela - time to merge?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specif
Amoratinos commented on PR #1851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1851#issuecomment-2504345645
@reschke I suppose you wanted to mention @anchela 😅
At least the pax exam repo seems somehow mantained
https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.exam/activity
I ran
reschke commented on PR #1851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1851#issuecomment-2503798901
@AngelaFabregues - paxExam is abandoned; we should not use it in "new" code
(see https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.ops4j.pax.exam/pax-exam)
--
This is an automated message f
Amoratinos commented on PR #1851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1851#issuecomment-2462717208
> use PaxExam to build ITs that accurately reflect running oak in a OSGi
setup like we have it in Adobe AEM. but maybe that's too much of an effort
compared to the gain.
Amoratinos opened a new pull request, #1851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1851
Migrated Groovy test files in oak-pojosr package to Java.
Asserts where changed to use junit assert methods imported statically.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
