Re: [nvo3] Poll for adoption and IPR check: draft-bl-nvo3-dataplane-requirements-03.txt

I have read the document and support its adoption as WG doc. -sam On Nov 28, 2012, at 8:16 AM, "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" wrote: > This email begins a two week poll to help the chairs judge if there is > consensus to adopt draft-bl-nvo3-dataplane-requirements-03.txt as an NVO3 > working grou

Re: [nvo3] Consensus call and IPR check on draft-rekhter-nvo3-vm-mobility-issues-03.txt

Read this draft, I would support adoption of the document as WG draft, as is. -sam On Nov 29, 2012, at 9:52 AM, "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" wrote: > There have been a number of requests for the WG to adopt > draft-rekhter-nvo3-vm-mobility-issues-03.txt as a working group draft. There > has als

Re: [nvo3] Poll for WG adoption of draft-mity-nvo3-use-case-04

Given that this is the only use case document, I support adoption of it as a WG document. cheers -sam On Jan 30, 2013, at 6:28 PM, Benson Schliesser wrote: > This email begins a two week poll to help the chairs judge if there is > consensus to adopt draft-mity-nvo3-use-case-04 as an NVO3 worki

[nvo3] Comments regarding draft-ashwood-nvo3-operational-requirement

Authors, I have few comments related to the draft. Cheers -sam - The title should be OAM framework and requirements. 'Operational' is misleading - I do not see much differentiation made between active and passive measurements, in each of those requirements. Which applies where is not clear en

Re: [nvo3] Draft Geneve

Hi all, Read the draft but have few questions on the same line others have asked. - Is this draft intended for standardizing within NVo3 WG? The status indicates it as informational. Also it is good to have it as draft-nvo3, if it is meant for NVo3 WG. - I fail to find good reasoning, in the

[nvo3] Share your meeting notes/minutes

Hi. If any of you have taken minutes of NVo3 WG meeting, held yesterday, please share it with me. I will consolidate minutes and share them with WG. thanks -sam ___ nvo3 mailing list nvo3@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Re: [nvo3] enhancing VXLAN/NVGRE vs creating an new encap

Before one analyses various encapsulations out there, newly proposed or existing ones, there should be a reference or set of requirements to compare with. I do not see those *new* requirements in the draft-ietf-nvo3-dataplane-requirements-02. It would be prudent for the authors of the documents

[nvo3] IETF 89 NVo3 WG session minutes

NVo3 WG, There were few requests asking meeting minutes for NVo3 WG session @ IETF 89 Please find them at () You could also find meeting materials at () cheers -sam __

[nvo3] IETF 90 NVo3 Slot Requests - Toronto

Hi All, IETF90 at Toronto is fast approaching and as per the agenda () NVO3 WG is scheduled to meet on Thursday, July24th, 2014, from 0900-1130 EDT. If you need a presentation slot for the IETF 90 NVo3 WG session, please reply to this email

[nvo3] Draft Agenda of IETF90 WG session

Hi, Draft Agenda is now posted. () All presenters, please send in your presentations no later than 21st July i.e. Monday EOB. Please unicast it to me and cc WG chairs. If there are any mistakes or corrections needed to the Agenda, please le

Re: [nvo3] Slot request for NVo3 Interim virtual meeting scheduled for 2nd Oct, 2014

This is a reminder for 2nd interim meeting to be held on October 2nd, 2014 at 14:00EST. Send in your request if you want to present a topic in the meeting. Conference Webex details could be found at < http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nvo3/current/msg03985.html> cheers -sam On Wed, Sep 24, 20

Re: [nvo3] Slot request for NVo3 Interim virtual meeting scheduled for 2nd Oct, 2014

gt; > > > Regards, > > Lucy > > > > *From:* nvo3 [mailto:nvo3-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Sam Aldrin > *Sent:* Monday, September 29, 2014 4:41 PM > *To:* nvo3@ietf.org > *Cc:* Benson Schliesser; Matthew Bocci > *Subject:* Re: [nvo3] Slot request for NVo3 Inte

[nvo3] Today's interim meeting agenda and details

Hi, Here are the meeting details and agenda. 1. Conference Webex details for the meeting could be found at 2. Agenda - WG chairs : Agenda bashing, charter update - Draft GUE presentation by Tom H. - Hpvr2vne-cp presentati

Re: [nvo3] Today's interim meeting agenda and details

Updated agenda with the draft names and link to proceedings > 1. Conference Webex details for the meeting could be found at > > 2. Agenda >- WG chairs : Agenda bashing, charter update >- Draft GUE presentation by Tom H. >

[nvo3] Next interim meeting

Hi, Next interim meeting is going to be on 21st October, 2014, 10:00 EDT. This will be last of the three interims before Honolulu IETF. Please plan ahead and mark your calendars. cheers -sam ___ nvo3 mailing list nvo3@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mail

[nvo3] Interim meeting minutes

Hi, Please find the draft versions of 1st and 2nd interim meeting minutes. Couldn’t take detailed notes for the 1st meeting, as I dialed in while on the road. Kindly go through the notes and add/edit/change (with changes highlighted), so that I could merge all the received changes. Please do so

[nvo3] Slot request for NVo3 Interim virtual meeting scheduled for 21stOct, 2014

Hello NVo3 WG, We held two of three interim meetings on 11th Sept and Oct 2nd, which were well attended and had good discussion. This email is to solicit slot requests for presenting in the third interim meeting. Meeting is scheduled for 21st October 10:00AM EST (7:00AM PST). Kindly email me, wi

[nvo3] 3rd interim meeting (Reminder)

Hello NVo3 WG, A gentle reminder to the meeting that is scheduled for 21st October 10:00AM EST (7:00AM PST). Webex details of the meeting could be found in this message. Agenda is now posted and could be found at < http://www.ietf

[nvo3] Slot request for NVo3 WG session at IETF91

Hello NVo3 WG, We had good sessions of three interim meetings held on 11th Sept, Oct 2nd and Oct 21st, respectively. This email is to solicit slot requests for presenting in the NVo3 WG session of IETF 91 to be held in Honolulu, HI. Final agenda could be found at < https://datatracker.ietf.org/mee

[nvo3] [Reminder] Slot request for NVo3 WG session at IETF91

> On Oct 21, 2014, at 10:37 AM, Sam Aldrin wrote: > > Hello NVo3 WG, > > We had good sessions of three interim meetings held on 11th Sept, Oct 2nd and > Oct 21st, respectively. This email is to solicit slot requests for presenting > in the NVo3 WG session of IETF 91 t

[nvo3] IETF91 NVo3 Agenda

Hi, Preliminary agenda is now posted. > Depending on the charter priority and time available, there could be changes to the agenda. All the presenters, please ensure the slides are sent

[nvo3] NVo3 WG meeting - agenda, note takers and jabber scribe

Hi, We have an updated agenda (>) Looking for volunteers to be note takers for the meeting. Would also like someone to volunteer as jabber scribe. Kindly, let us know. Much appreciated.

[nvo3] IETF91 NVo3 Meeting minutes

Hi, IETF91 meeting minutes have now been uploaded. Thanks to Jon Hudson for taking minutes. Really appreciate that. Do find them at Please do send in any missing minutes/notes or any corrections needed to be made. Would be glad to enter

[nvo3] Interim Meeting (Jan 28th 2015) - minutes

Minutes of the meeting are now available at Cheers -sam ___ nvo3 mailing list nvo3@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

[nvo3] IETF NVo3 interim Feb 12th 2015 - minutes

Meeting minutes are now posted at > Cheers -sam___ nvo3 mailing l

[nvo3] IETF92 Dallas - Slot request

Hi Everyone, NVo3 WG session is scheduled to meed on two days. First session is scheduled for Monday, March 23rd, 2015, from 1520-1650 CDT. Second session is scheduled for Wednesday, March 25th, 2015, from 1520-1620. For more details on complete and upto date IETF agenda, please find it at

[nvo3] NVo3 May 22 2015 interim meeting minutes uploaded

Minutes are now uploaded. They could be found at > Thanks to Sue and Matt for taking notes. Do let me know

[nvo3] IETF Prague WG session presentation slot request

Hi NVo3 WG, IETF Prague is coming up soon. We are scheduled to meet on July 22nd in Grand Hilton Ball room from 15:50 till 17:20. This WG session, we would like to focus on completing milestones. Hence priority will be given to presentations related to those ID’s. Kindly send in your slot reques

Re: [nvo3] 答复: Virtual Interim - 2015-07-10 10:00-11:30 EDT

Ack Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 25, 2015, at 5:51 PM, gu.zhon...@zte.com.cn wrote: > > We would like a 20min time slot for discussing the draft > draft-gu-nvo3-vntp-01. > > ID Title>draft-gu-nvo3-vntp-01 > URL> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gu-nvo3-vntp/ > Presenter>Zhongyu Gu/Bhumi

Re: [nvo3] Virtual Interim - 2015-07-10 10:00-11:30 EDT

Hi All, I have posted tentative agenda for the upcoming interim, based on the requests I received. The agenda and order could change depending on the priorities of WG deliverables. Will be updating the WebEx info, very soon.

[nvo3] IETF93 NVo3 Meeting minutes

Meeting minutes for IETF93 NVo3 WG session are now uploaded. Special thanks to Ignas for taking notes as well. We have tried our best to capture as minutes, while focussed on the content itself. Hence, there may be changes or correc

[nvo3] Preliminary agenda posted

Hi, Preliminary agenda of IETF 94 NVO3 WG meeting is now posted. Find that at Do note that, the agenda could change as WG chairs prioritizes the work items against the time available. Presenters, please do get the presentation materials send

[nvo3] Slides for IETF94 WG session

Hi, Folks who are on the agenda to present at IETF 94, do remember to send in the slides at the earliest in order to keep your slot. Do cc WG chairs as I won’t be at Yoko. For those who have sent them, thank you. cheers -sam ___ nvo3 mailing list nvo3

Re: [nvo3] draft-­-pang-­-nvo3-­-vxlan-­-path-­-detection-­-01

I expressed the same concern at last IETF meeting, as Shahram raised here. Haven’t gotten the explanation yet. If TTL expiry mechanism is used, then the definition of IP TTL will have to be redefined in order to make a copy and forward to next hop. But if L3 devices have to read into VXLAN heade

Re: [nvo3] draft-­-pang-­-nvo3-­-vxlan-­-path-­-detection-­-01

> On Nov 3, 2015, at 6:47 PM, Dapeng Liu wrote: > > > > 2015-11-04 10:29 GMT+08:00 Sam Aldrin <mailto:aldrin.i...@gmail.com>>: > I expressed the same concern at last IETF meeting, as Shahram raised here. > Haven’t gotten the explanation yet. > > If TT

Re: [nvo3] draft-­-pang-­-nvo3-­-vxlan-­-path-­-detection-­-01

> We evaluated multiple Asic and found out solution can be done on multiple > broadcom and custom Asic and Alibaba network is running on 2 different > Broadcom Asic. And your point being? :D -sam > > Thanks > Deepak > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Nov 4, 201

Re: [nvo3] draft-­-pang-­-nvo3-­-vxlan-­-path-­-detection-­-01

o software vtep can be fixed. > > Why can't software based and hardware based solution co-exist when > information draft won't force everyone to implement it. > > Thanks > Deepak > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Nov 4, 2015, at 12:41 PM, Sam Aldrin <mailto

Re: [nvo3] draft-­-pang-­-nvo3-­-vxlan-­-path-­-detection-­-01

> On Nov 3, 2015, at 9:10 PM, Dapeng Liu wrote: > > > > 2015-11-04 11:04 GMT+08:00 Sam Aldrin <mailto:aldrin.i...@gmail.com>>: > >> On Nov 3, 2015, at 6:47 PM, Dapeng Liu > <mailto:maxpass...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >&g

Re: [nvo3] draft-­-pang-­-nvo3-­-vxlan-­-path-­-detection-­-01

-邮件原件- > 发件人: nvo3 [mailto:nvo3-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Tom Herbert > 发送时间: 2015年11月5日 6:05 > 收件人: Haoweiguo > 抄送: Sam Aldrin; Shahram Davari; nvo3@ietf.org; Dacheng Zhang; Deepak > Kumar (dekumar) > 主题: Re: [nvo3] draft--pang--nvo3--vxlan--path--detection--01 > > On Wed, Nov 4,

Re: [nvo3] draft-­-pang-­-nvo3-­-vxlan-­-path-­-detection-­-01

ore turning on the > solution. > > We can even call this extension of vxlan with pd bit. > > Thanks, > Deepak > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Nov 4, 2015, at 3:09 PM, Sam Aldrin wrote: > > Hi Deepak, > > Aren’t you or aren’t you not changing the packet form

Re: [nvo3] draft-­-pang-­-nvo3-­-vxlan-­-path-­-detection-­-01

s the implication? > > Yizhou > > > 发件人: Sam Aldrin [mailto:aldrin.i...@gmail.com] > 发送时间: 2015年11月5日 10:14 > 收件人: Liyizhou > 抄送: Tom Herbert; Haoweiguo; Shahram Davari; nvo3@ietf.org; Dacheng Zhang; > Deepak Kumar (dekumar) > 主题: Re: [nvo3] draft-­-pang-­-nvo3-­-vxlan

[nvo3] IETF94 NVo3 WG meeting minutes now available

Please find the IETF94 NVO3 meeting minutes at materials page. Many thanks to Ignas for helping out, yet again, in taking minutes. Any corrections, please do send the proposed text, where needed. https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/minutes/minutes-94-nvo3

Re: [nvo3] [sfc] comment on draft-kumar-sfc-nsh-udp-transport

Need for a new protocol should not be based on how hard or easy it is easy to get ethertype or UDP port. That is procedural pain than technical merit. I tend to agree with Dino. If NSH could run as a transport client just like any other application, we should do that. Otherwise authors should pr

Re: [nvo3] [sfc] comment on draft-kumar-sfc-nsh-udp-transport

> On Nov 5, 2015, at 5:28 PM, Lucy yong wrote: > > > > Need for a new protocol should not be based on how hard or easy it is easy to > get ethertype or UDP port. That is procedural pain than technical merit. > [Lucy] Agree. > > I tend to agree with Dino. If NSH could run as a transport clien

[nvo3] Slot requests

Hi, Nvo3 WG meeting is scheduled for April 4th 2016 from 14:00-15:30 (ART). Kindly send in your request at the earliest for presentation slot. Agenda will be published soon. Thanks Sam Sent from my iPhone ___ nvo3 mailing list nvo3@ietf.org https://w

[nvo3] IETF96 - NVo3 WG meeting slot request

Hi, IETF96 preliminary agenda is now available at > NVo3 WG is scheduled to meet on July 20th 14:00 - 15:30 in Potsdam-1 meeting room. If you are planning to present, kindly send in your sl

Re: [nvo3] IETF96 - NVo3 WG meeting slot request

Gentle reminder. Planning to present? Send in your request at the earliest. Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 23, 2016, at 5:57 PM, Sam Aldrin wrote: > > Hi, > > IETF96 preliminary agenda is now available at > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/96/agenda.html> > N

[nvo3] Draft minutes posted

Hello WG, Draft minuted of the WG session are now posted. Thanks to Ignas for taking minutes and Carlos for being the jabber scribe. Do send in any corrections or suggested changes to be applied to the minutes. cheers Sam & Matthew _

Re: [nvo3] Consensus call on encap proposals

As asked in the original email, please do provide technical objections to the solutions within the NVo3 WG. This will enable to form consensus in order to resolve the issues and come up with a solution(s) adopted by WG @IETF. As mentioned by Alia, consensus and decision process will be based on R

Re: [nvo3] Consensus call on encap proposals

Resending with some edits (post coffee). As asked in the original email, please do provide technical objections to the solutions within the NVo3 WG. This will enable to form consensus in order to resolve the issues and come up with a solution(s) adopted by WG @IETF. As mentioned by Alia, consens

Re: [nvo3] Discussion on encapsulation formats and next steps

Thanks, Greg, noted. -sam On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote: > Dear Matthew, Sam, et. al, > I think that concentrating on the proposal to "focus on control plane and > OAM" we can achieve practical results despite differences among data plane > encapsulations. Please count me in

Re: [nvo3] Discussion on encapsulation formats and next steps

Hi Fabio, It would be nice to have ONE encap which could ensure that it meets various requirements of network, which were discussed at length over the course of NVo3 WG. As raised by many on the list, there were technical objections raised for each of the encap. Making a doc an informational RFC

Re: [nvo3] Discussion on encapsulation formats and next steps

Anoop, Couple of questions, if I may ask 1. How do you plan to address technical objections raised? 2. Not interested because it is too late and would rather live with any deficiencies in the DP proposals? -sam On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Anoop Ghanwani wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 2:

Re: [nvo3] Discussion on encapsulation formats and next steps

d, efficacy, and the price of backwards > compatibility can be argued, so that advantage is not a slam dunk either. > > Anoop > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Sam Aldrin wrote: > >> Anoop, >> >> >> Couple of questions, if I may ask >> 1. How do you

Re: [nvo3] Discussion on encapsulation formats and next steps

igh). The WG agreeing on the interpretation of some bits in VXLAN > can add clarity at this point IMHO. Also they are just > informational/experimental RFCs. > > > > (Agreeing with Anoop) > > Cheers, > > Don > > > > *From:* nvo3 [mailto:nvo3-boun...@ietf.org]

Re: [nvo3] Discussion on encapsulation formats and next steps

Joe, Inline with my comments as individual. On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Joe Touch wrote: > Hi, all, > > > On 10/5/2016 10:29 AM, Sam Aldrin wrote: > > As I said in one my earlier emails, if new encap proposals are not > > converging on resolving issues, why

Re: [nvo3] Discussion on encapsulation formats and next steps

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Joe Touch wrote: > > > On 10/5/2016 12:02 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Sam Aldrin > wrote: > > ...> I personally do not think WG should just *stamp RFC for drafts because > of> business reaso

Re: [nvo3] Discussion on encapsulation formats and next steps

> for the way forward? > Plan is as suggested in the original email. Hopefully, we could derive an agreement and move forward. -sam > > Anoop > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Sam Aldrin wrote: > >> Anoop, >> >> As I said in one my earlier emails, if new en

Re: [nvo3] Discussion on encapsulation formats and next steps

> We would like to hear opinions and confirmation or disagreement on > interest in creating a DP encapsulation that addresses the various > technical concerns. > >>> > I still think we are better off with the 3 encapsulations as is, then we > would be if had 4 or 6 enca

Re: [nvo3] Discussion on encapsulation formats and next steps

Plan is as outlined at the start of the thread. -sam On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Anoop Ghanwani wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Sam Aldrin wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Anoop Ghanwani >> wrote: >> >>> >>>

Re: [nvo3] Discussion on encapsulation formats and next steps

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Joe Touch wrote: > > > On 10/5/2016 6:16 PM, Sam Aldrin wrote: > > These could be independent informational docs instead. That's common for >> de-facto industry standards already deployed, as long as they don't >> *interf

Re: [nvo3] Discussion on encapsulation formats and next steps

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Joe Touch wrote: > > > On 10/6/2016 8:34 AM, Sam Aldrin wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Joe Touch wrote: > >> >> The original email did propose that we continue to evaluate existing >> encapsulations, but N

Re: [nvo3] Poll for WG adoption: draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-04

Support. -sam On Aug 14, 2012, at 8:48 AM, "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" wrote: > All, > > At the Vancouver IETF, there was considerable support for adopting > draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-03 as an NVO3 working group > document. However, there was also some support for > draft-fang

Re: [nvo3] Poll for WG adoption: draft-lasserre-nvo3-framework-03.txt

support. -sam On Aug 29, 2012, at 9:01 AM, "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" wrote: > This email begins a poll to help gauge consensus to adopt > draft-lasserre-nvo3-framework-03.txt as an NVO3 working group document. > > Since this is the second call for adoption, and only a few changes were > req

[nvo3] Encap draft published by design team

Hello NVo3 WG, NVo3 Design Team for encap has put in quite a bit of effort to meet, discuss and hashout various requirements and issues and coming up with a draft on proposed encap. Thanks to all who have participated and made it possible. This document could be found at URL:https://w

[nvo3] Shepherd writeup for draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-08

ew vendors have implemented the solution and was deployed as well. Personnel: Who is the Document Shepherd? Who is the Responsible Area Director? Document Shepherds - Sam Aldrin Responsible AD - Alia Atlas (3) Briefly describe the review of this document that was performed by the Document Shepher

[nvo3] Call for agenda items

NV03 WG is scheduled to meet on Wednesday of the IETF week at Prague. If you'd like to present drafts at the meeting, kindly send the following - name of the draft - time requested - presenter's name TIA Sam and Matthew ___ nvo3 mailing list nvo3@iet

[nvo3] IPR poll on draft-rabadan-nvo3-evpn-applicability

Working Group, authors, We have started to prepare the the draft-rabadan-nvo3-evpn-applicability for working group adoption, prior to the wgap we need to do an IPR poll. This mail starts this IPR poll. Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-rabadan-nvo3-evpn-applicability? If so, has th

[nvo3] working group adoption poll on draft-rabadan-nvo3-evpn-applicability

Working Group, This is to start a three week poll on adopting draft-rabadan-nvo3-evpn-applicability as a NVo3 working group document. Please send your comments (support/not support) to the nvo3 working group mailing list (

[nvo3] CLOSED: working group adoption poll on draft-rabadan-nvo3-evpn-applicability

document that were polled. -sam On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 6:30 PM Sam Aldrin wrote: > Working Group, > > This is to start a three week poll on adopting > draft-rabadan-nvo3-evpn-applicability as a NVo3 working group > document. > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rabadan-nv

[nvo3] (no subject)

NVo3 Working Group, This is to initiate a three (not two) week working group last call on draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability, due to IETF .. Please send your comments to the nvo3 wg mailing list (nvo3@ietf.org). There are no IPR disclosures directly against draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability Au

[nvo3] Last call for draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability

[Resending with right subject] NVo3 Working Group, This is to initiate a three (not two) week working group last call on draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability Please send your comments to the nvo3 wg mailing list (nvo3@ietf.org). During draft adoption as WG doc, authors have stated on the worki

Re: [nvo3] Last call for draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability

The LC for the draft is now closed. Apologize for the delayed notification to the group. Will follow up with authors about the next steps. -sam On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:15 AM Sam Aldrin wrote: > [Resending with right subject] > > NVo3 Working Group, > > This is to initiate a

[nvo3] Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability

Dear authors, I have performed review of draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability . Even though I have few comments he draft is in good shape. Kindly address these comments and publish a new version of the draft. Will be doing the shepherd write up after that. Comments: - Please fix the type for WM

Re: [nvo3] minutes available

Hi YiZhou, Thanks for the minutes. Appreciate it. -sam On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 9:16 PM Liyizhou wrote: > Hi folks, > > > > Please find the minutes for ietf 105 nvo3 session at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/minutes-105-nvo3-00 > > > > Any corrections, please let me know.

Re: [nvo3] [Last-Call] Last Call: (Geneve: Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation) to Proposed Standard

Hi Daniel, Speaking as individual with chair hat off. I'll let authors detail more responses. See inline for my comments. On Wed, Nov 27, 2019, 2:35 AM Daniel Migault wrote: > Hi, > > I do have some architecture concerns regarding the Geneve specification. > My concerns have already been rai

Re: [nvo3] [Last-Call] Last Call: (Geneve: Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation) to Proposed Standard

Hi Daniel, Please find my responses inline. -sam On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 7:45 AM Daniel Migault wrote: > Hi Sam, > > > > Thanks for the feed backs. See my responses. > > > > Yours, > > Daniel > > > > *From:* Sam Aldrin > *Sent:* Wednesday,

[nvo3] WG Last call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-nvo3-yang-cfg-04

This email begins a two-week working group last call for draft-ietf-nvo3-yang-cfg-04. Please review the draft and post any comments to the NVO3 working group list. If you have read the latest version of the draft but have no comments and believe it is ready for publication as a standards track R

Re: [nvo3] Second Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-nvo3-encap

I support this as a contributor and am not aware of any IPR. Thanks! -sam On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 1:17 PM Erik Nordmark wrote: > On 7/1/21 17:09, Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) wrote: > > This email begins a two-week working group last call for > > draft-ietf-nvo3-encap-06. > > > > Please review t

Re: [nvo3] WG Last call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-nvo3-yang-cfg-04

authors. Emails from co-authors were indeed received, and I failed to follow through. Sorry about that. Will be reaching out to authors regarding next steps. -sam On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 11:53 PM Sam Aldrin wrote: > This email begins a two-week working group last call for > draft-ietf-nvo

Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve

As a coauthor, I support the publication of this document. Not aware of any ipr pertaining to the draft. Sam On Mon, Oct 10, 2022, 9:50 PM Santosh P K wrote: > Hello All, >As a co-autor, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. I > support publication of this document as Standa

[nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-07

This email begins a two-week working group last call for draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-07 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam/ ). Please review the draft and post any comments to the NVO3 working group list. If

Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-07

please respond? Thanks -sam On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 11:27 PM Sam Aldrin wrote: > This email begins a two-week working group last call for > draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-07 > > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/d

[nvo3] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability-02

Sam Aldrin has requested publication of draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability-02 as None on behalf of the NVO3 working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability/ ___ nvo3 ma