On 5 December 2017 at 17:32, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Ralf Gommers
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Jarrod Millman
>> > wrote:
>> >> Assuming that sounds good, my tentative next steps ar
> Furher resources to consider:
> - How did Jupyter organize their roadmap (ask Brian Granger)?
> - How did Pandas run the project with a full time maintainer (Jeff Reback)?
> - Can we copy other projects' management guidelines?
>
scikit-learn also has a number of full time developers. Might be wo
Dear all,
(apologies for the cross-posting)
The SciPy conference would like to invite you to submit proposals for Birds
of a Feather (BOF) sessions at this year's SciPy! BOFs usually include
short presentations by a panel and a moderator with the bulk of the time
spent opening up the discussion t
onference, use in any materials or on its
website, with attribution to the original author(s).
SciPy John Hunter Excellence in Plotting Competition Co-Chairs
Thomas Caswell
Michael Droettboom
Nelle Varoquaux
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-
On 3 August 2018 at 11:20, Chris Barker wrote:
> One other thought:
>
> Given Jupyter, numpy, scipy, matplotlib?, etc, are all working on a CoC --
> maybe we could have NumFocus take a lead on this for the whole community?
>
> I think most (all?) of the NumFocus projects have essentially the same
Hi,
I'm pretty sure not all funding is acknowledged on scikit-learn's
frontpage. I think the minimum amount to be acknowledge with a logo is
funding for a full time developer for at least a year, ie at least 100k€.
Cheers,
N
On Sat, 18 May 2019 at 09:37, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In [1]
