On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 08:40 -0700, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
> I think this is a great idea! I don't see any downsides here.
>
> As for the method name, I would lean towards calling it "kind" and
> using a
> default value of None for automatic selection, for consistency with
> np.sort.
:+1:, I agree w
I think this is a great idea! I don't see any downsides here.
As for the method name, I would lean towards calling it "kind" and using a
default value of None for automatic selection, for consistency with np.sort.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 6:14 AM Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> there is a PR
