RE: [NTSysADM] SMB Signing Mystery

2016-05-16 Thread Charles F Sullivan
that was more intuitive. *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Nathan Shelby *Sent:* Monday, May 16, 2016 10:31 AM *To:* ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com *Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] SMB Signing Mystery When the client connects in this situation

Re: [NTSysADM] SMB Signing Mystery

2016-05-16 Thread Nathan Shelby
When the client connects in this situation you are creating a signed session. Microsoft has a blog post explaining the effects of the GPOs on SMB signing that explain the behavior your seeing: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/josebda/2010/12/01/the-basics-of-smb-signing-covering-both-smb1-and-

[NTSysADM] SMB Signing Mystery

2016-05-16 Thread Charles F Sullivan
In troubleshooting a CIFS/SMB issue, I am trying to configure SMB signing to cause a failed connection. - On the server (Windows 2012 domain member), I have SMB signing disabled. Server – Digitally Sign Communications (always): Disabled | Digitally Sign Communications (if client agrees):