Hey, I am trying to implement a simulation for a data center to compare
the TCP, DCTCP and MPTCP protocol and while I am still at the very early
stages - I have just finished writing the code to generate the topology
which is a clos fat-tree with the number of ports as a variable deciding
the
Hey, I am trying to implement a simulation for a data center to compare
the TCP, DCTCP and MPTCP protocol and while I am still at the very early
stages - I have just finished writing the code to generate the topology
which is a clos fat-tree with the number of ports as a variable deciding
the si
I am running simulations for my project and I have both nam files
(/namtrace-all/) and trace files (/trace-all/) recording. The namfile
ends up in the order of ~15GB for 5 sec of simulation and the trace
files in the order of ~5GB. My question is do I need both or can I just
choose one. I know
he nam file, I have used just for see what happen graphically.
>
> So, analyzing ".tr" file you can accomplish you want to do.
>
> Regards.
>
>
> 2014-04-11 11:47 GMT-05:00 Andreas Andreou <mailto:vhf_and...@yahoo.gr>>:
>
>
> I am runni
I am doing a simulation on ns-2 for a datacenter network and I just
realised that I am not sure how exactly I would go to calculate the
network throughput.
I know that to calculate throughput over a link I would first trace the
last hop link, add the received packet sizes for the correct
sour
hroughput using monitor-queue as well, it
would probably really limit the disk usage and I am guessing less
writings to files should also improve performance but I am not sure
something might be lost if I don't have the trace.
Andreas Andreou
---
This email is free from viruses and malware
So I am trying to run a simulation using the MPTCP protocol in a data
center but rtProto DV is not working; produces an error, I am guessing
the implementations doesn't have support for it and I can't figure out
what to change so it works. For anyone interested that might have an
idea this is
