Re: [Nova-network] quantum-related reviews

2011-12-13 Thread Dan Wendlandt
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Trey Morris wrote: > I'm on it Thanks! > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Doude wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I opened a Nova bug related to the IPAM lib and his fix >> yesterday:https://review.openstack.org/#change,2254 >> >> It need to be reviewed because I'm

Re: [Nova-network] quantum-related reviews

2011-12-13 Thread Trey Morris
I'm on it On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Doude wrote: > Hi, > > I opened a Nova bug related to the IPAM lib and his fix > yesterday:https://review.openstack.org/#change,2254 > > It need to be reviewed because I'm not sure of my fix. > > Doude. > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Dan Wendla

Re: [Nova-network] quantum-related reviews

2011-12-13 Thread Doude
Hi, I opened a Nova bug related to the IPAM lib and his fix yesterday:https://review.openstack.org/#change,2254 It need to be reviewed because I'm not sure of my fix. Doude. On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > hi nova-network team, > > a couple of quantum-related bugs in

[Nova-network] quantum-related reviews

2011-12-13 Thread Dan Wendlandt
hi nova-network team, a couple of quantum-related bugs in nova have reported recently and we'd love to get at least one or two reviewed for essex-2: here's a list, representing my thoughts on priority order: - https://review.openstack.org/#change,2265 : fixes a regression that clearly breaks Qu