On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Trey Morris wrote:
> I'm on it
Thanks!
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Doude wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I opened a Nova bug related to the IPAM lib and his fix
>> yesterday:https://review.openstack.org/#change,2254
>>
>> It need to be reviewed because I'm
I'm on it
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Doude wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I opened a Nova bug related to the IPAM lib and his fix
> yesterday:https://review.openstack.org/#change,2254
>
> It need to be reviewed because I'm not sure of my fix.
>
> Doude.
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Dan Wendla
Hi,
I opened a Nova bug related to the IPAM lib and his fix
yesterday:https://review.openstack.org/#change,2254
It need to be reviewed because I'm not sure of my fix.
Doude.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
> hi nova-network team,
>
> a couple of quantum-related bugs in
hi nova-network team,
a couple of quantum-related bugs in nova have reported recently and we'd
love to get at least one or two reviewed for essex-2:
here's a list, representing my thoughts on priority order:
- https://review.openstack.org/#change,2265 : fixes a regression that
clearly breaks Qu
4 matches
Mail list logo