On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 03:58:59PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end was introduced in GCC-14, and we are
> getting ready to enable it, globally.
>
> Use the `DEFINE_RAW_FLEX()` helper for an on-stack definition of
> a flexible structure where the size of the flexi
Applied this one (as well as the svm and fence one) to drm-misc-next, thanks!
Awesome. :)
Thanks!
--
Gustavo
-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end was introduced in GCC-14, and we are
getting ready to enable it, globally.
Use the `DEFINE_RAW_FLEX()` helper for an on-stack definition of
a flexible structure where the size of the flexible-array member
is known at compile-time, and refactor the rest of the code,
a
-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end was introduced in GCC-14, and we are
getting ready to enable it, globally.
Use the `DEFINE_RAW_FLEX()` helper for a few on-stack definitions
of a flexible structure where the size of the flexible-array member
is known at compile-time, and refactor the rest of the cod
Nouveau currently relies on the assumption that dma_fences will only
ever get signalled through nouveau_fence_signal(), which takes care of
removing a signalled fence from the list nouveau_fence_chan.pending.
This self-imposed rule is violated in nouveau_fence_done(), where
dma_fence_is_signaled()
Am 03.04.25 um 14:58 schrieb Philipp Stanner:
> On Thu, 2025-04-03 at 14:08 +0200, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 03.04.25 um 12:13 schrieb Philipp Stanner:
>>> Nouveau currently relies on the assumption that dma_fences will
>>> only
>>> ever get signalled through nouveau_fence_signal(), which takes
Am 03.04.25 um 12:25 schrieb Danilo Krummrich:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 12:17:29PM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote:
>> On Thu, 2025-04-03 at 12:13 +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote:
>>> -static int
>>> -nouveau_fence_signal(struct nouveau_fence *fence)
>>> +static void
>>> +nouveau_fence_cleanup_cb(struct
Am 03.04.25 um 15:15 schrieb Danilo Krummrich:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 02:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote:
>> On Thu, 2025-04-03 at 14:08 +0200, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 03.04.25 um 12:13 schrieb Philipp Stanner:
>>> BTW: nouveau_fence_no_signaling() looks completely broken as well. It
Am 03.04.25 um 12:13 schrieb Philipp Stanner:
> Nouveau currently relies on the assumption that dma_fences will only
> ever get signalled through nouveau_fence_signal(), which takes care of
> removing a signalled fence from the list nouveau_fence_chan.pending.
>
> This self-imposed rule is violated
On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 02:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-04-03 at 14:08 +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > Am 03.04.25 um 12:13 schrieb Philipp Stanner:
>
> > BTW: nouveau_fence_no_signaling() looks completely broken as well. It
> > calls nouveau_fence_is_signaled() and then
10 matches
Mail list logo
