Re: [PATCH 2/2] dma-fence: Improve docu for dma_fence_check_and_signal()

2025-04-09 Thread Li, Yunxiang (Teddy)
.linux.dev; spice-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; intel...@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [PATCH 2/2] dma-fence: Improve docu for dma_fence_check_and_signal() The documentation of the return value of dma_fence_check_and_signal() and dma_fence_check_and_signal_locked() reads as if the returned boolean only

[PATCH 2/2] dma-fence: Improve docu for dma_fence_check_and_signal()

2025-04-09 Thread Philipp Stanner
The documentation of the return value of dma_fence_check_and_signal() and dma_fence_check_and_signal_locked() reads as if the returned boolean only describes whether dma_fence_signal() (or similar) has been called before this function call already. That's not the case, since dma_fence_ops.signaled(