Re: [PATCH 02/19] drm: Pass pixel_format+modifier directly to drm_get_format_info()

2025-04-11 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Hi Am 10.04.25 um 18:32 schrieb Ville Syrjala: [...] include/drm/drm_fourcc.h | 2 +- AFAICT you can also remove the forward declaration of struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 from this header. Best regards Thomas 17 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --g

Re: [PATCH 02/19] drm: Pass pixel_format+modifier directly to drm_get_format_info()

2025-04-10 Thread kernel test robot
odifier-to-get_format_info/20250411-005845 base: linus/master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250410163218.15130-3-ville.syrjala%40linux.intel.com patch subject: [PATCH 02/19] drm: Pass pixel_format+modifier directly to drm_get_format_info() config: hexagon-randconfig-001-20250411 (https://d

Re: [PATCH 02/19] drm: Pass pixel_format+modifier directly to drm_get_format_info()

2025-04-10 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Ville, Thank you for the patch. On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 07:32:01PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Decouple drm_get_format_info() from struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 and just > pass the pixel format+modifier combo in by hand. > > We may want to use drm_get_format_info() outsi

[PATCH 02/19] drm: Pass pixel_format+modifier directly to drm_get_format_info()

2025-04-10 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Decouple drm_get_format_info() from struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 and just pass the pixel format+modifier combo in by hand. We may want to use drm_get_format_info() outside of the normal addfb paths where we won't have a struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2, and creating a temporary one just fo