He-Pin merged PR #1700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/1700
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@pekko.a
He-Pin commented on PR #1700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/1700#issuecomment-2582697165
@pjfanning Thanks.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To u
pjfanning commented on PR #1700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/1700#issuecomment-2582612861
> @pjfanning The code is the same as it is in `MapAsyncPartitioned`
this is still a change that reduces performance by adding a check that needs
evaluation
--
This is an automate
He-Pin commented on PR #1700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/1700#issuecomment-2582503217
@pjfanning The code is the same as it is in `MapAsyncPartitioned`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use th
pjfanning commented on PR #1700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/1700#issuecomment-2582479338
* is it really possible to end up in a position where the requirement fails?
* if so, can we add a test?
* also, what would users of older versions see in this case? an exception, a
