ferenc-csaky commented on PR #1794:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/1794#issuecomment-2803761694
> @ferenc-csaky wdyt , we plan to upgrade to netty 4.2.0.final in next
version, Will flink upgrade to Netty 4.2.x too?
Sorry for the late answer, AFAIK there is no push ATM to do
He-Pin commented on PR #1794:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/1794#issuecomment-2781379857
@pjfanning Yes, we need some abstraction to do that, currently, it's bound
to NioSocket, the Netty 4.2 is pretty cool about separate the iohandler with
eventloop, I think that can be done mo
mkurz commented on PR #1794:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/1794#issuecomment-2781369533
I agree. Just upgrading the dependency is definitely enough for now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use t
pjfanning commented on PR #1794:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/1794#issuecomment-2781344348
@He-Pin @mkurz I had a quick look at Pekko code and it doesn't immediately
look like we use the Netty abstractions that now support io_uring. I may have
missed something. I would prefer t
He-Pin commented on PR #1794:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/1794#issuecomment-2781312080
@ferenc-csaky wdyt , we plan to upgrade to netty 4.2.0.final in next
version, Will flink upgrade to Netty 4.2.x too?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
