Re: [I] failed: MetricsBasedResizerSpec [pekko]

2025-03-23 Thread via GitHub
pjfanning commented on issue #1796: URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko/issues/1796#issuecomment-2746511514 This suite has been flaky even in Akka days. https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aakka%2Fakka+MetricsBasedResizerSpec&type=issues Not sure why it has become flakier recent

Re: [I] failed: MetricsBasedResizerSpec [pekko]

2025-03-23 Thread via GitHub
pjfanning commented on issue #1796: URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko/issues/1796#issuecomment-2746236682 I found this gist that allows you to rerun each test multiple times. Even with bug numbers, the MetricsBasedResizerSpec tests are always pass for me locally. Maybe it is something ab

Re: [I] failed: MetricsBasedResizerSpec [pekko]

2025-03-14 Thread via GitHub
pjfanning commented on issue #1796: URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko/issues/1796#issuecomment-2724208874 Also seeing ``` must record the performance log with the correct pool size *** FAILED *** (1 millisecond) [03-14 00:21:56.751] [info] None was empty (MetricsBasedResizerSp

Re: [I] failed: MetricsBasedResizerSpec [pekko]

2025-03-14 Thread via GitHub
pjfanning commented on issue #1796: URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko/issues/1796#issuecomment-2724196445 This started failing a lot about 2 weeks ago. In the Nightly tests, we run a matrix of plans with various Java and Scala versions so that same tests are run a lot. This test is