pjfanning commented on issue #1694:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko/issues/1694#issuecomment-2574982341
* the 1.0 job could be run weekly or on demand - we probably don't need it
nightly since it is not a very active branch
* the main focus should be on cutting down the PR CI time be
raboof commented on issue #1694:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko/issues/1694#issuecomment-2574880280
> Maybe we can stop 1.0.0-nightly build?
I think we should keep that around until we officially EOL the 1.0.x branch
- which is something we might want to discuss but perhaps not
He-Pin commented on issue #1694:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko/issues/1694#issuecomment-2574767446
Maybe we can stop 1.0.0-nightly build?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
raboof opened a new issue, #1694:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko/issues/1694
We currently use between about 45-115 hours of GitHub Actions per day
(https://github.com/apache/pekko/actions/metrics/usage,
https://infra-reports.apache.org/#ghactions), and some jobs that are ran as
part
