sashapolo merged PR #4998:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/4998
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@i
lichaohao closed issue #11796: 【quesition】how to set TTL ,when create table by
sql
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite/issues/11796
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific co
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #4998:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/4998
Bumps [org.assertj:assertj-core](https://github.com/assertj/assertj) from
3.27.1 to 3.27.2.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/assertj/assertj/releases";>org.assertj:asser
sashapolo commented on PR #4990:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/4990#issuecomment-2572883162
Thank you, will be looking forward to your future contributions.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and us
sashapolo commented on PR #4990:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/4990#issuecomment-2572642849
I would like to stress the difference between `waitForCondition` and
`assertTimeoutPreemptively` (or `@Timeout` in this case):
1. `waitForCondition` executes the given predicate
12rcu commented on PR #4990:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/4990#issuecomment-2572843801
@sashapolo Now I understand you, yes you are absolutely right, it seems I
was just lucky not to trigger a failure. I will convert this PR back to a draft
and look for a better solution.
