Re: [nodejs] Re: nodeconf videos?

2013-02-08 Thread Luke Arduini
Post-production takes a long time :). Plus figure in that conference organizers usually have jobs, consulting and other obligations, families, kids, dogs, maybe occasional court appearances, etc. Even if you're not uploading all the videos you might have done post for all of them :). On Friday, Fe

Re: [nodejs] Re: nodeconf videos?

2013-02-08 Thread mike
i guess conference organizer's are the ones that watch the videos (sarcasm) this post started a few months ago and still only a couple of videos have come out ... as someone very interested in watching them, it is disappointing not being able to because Kubrick is taking his sweet time in post pro

[nodejs] Dependency-driven asynchronous request processing?

2013-02-08 Thread Mikhail Zabaluev
Hi, I have created a website using Express, like perhaps most of the people who do their first project on Node.js. I find it a simple and convenient stack for basic and moderately complex websites. However, I'm curious to learn of ways to use Express, or any other frameworks that don't have the

[nodejs] Re: Need advice, STDOUT and STDERR of child_process asynchronously rander to index page

2013-02-08 Thread nicolas
Hello Suraj, I suspect that you have been using child_process.exec(). Look into child_process.spawn() . It returns an EventEmitter and allows you to add stdout, stderr and exit listeners that will b

Re: [nodejs] Elegant way to require('some-app-component')

2013-02-08 Thread Jake Verbaten
Just put your component in NPM. The more your application looks like a nested tree of packages the easier things get. On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Geerten van Meel wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on an app and would like to access a component of my > app simply using require('component') inste

[nodejs] Re: Elegant way to require('some-app-component')

2013-02-08 Thread tjholowaychuk
we use NODE_PATH=lib for this, but we had to write a wrapper around npm to traverse the bundledDependencies so that your app modules are treated like any others as far as dependencies go. On Friday, 8 February 2013 17:24:39 UTC-8, Geerten van Meel wrote: > > Hi, > > I am working on an app and wo

Re: [nodejs] Elegant way to require('some-app-component')

2013-02-08 Thread Jacob Groundwater
> > mkdir node_modules > mv path/to/component.js node_modules/component.js > node -pe "require('component') // voila" > I actually use this method, but if you're on POSIX system, you can symlink it. It lets you develop as a single application, but encourages you to package-ize your co

Re: [nodejs] Elegant way to require('some-app-component')

2013-02-08 Thread Isaac Schlueter
I don't think it's a hack. Rather elegant, really: mkdir node_modules mv path/to/component.js node_modules/component.js node -pe "require('component') // voila" You could also make it a full-fledged package (jus a matter of adding one extra file package.json, which npm can do for you

[nodejs] Need advice, STDOUT and STDERR of child_process asynchronously rander to index page

2013-02-08 Thread Suraj Singh Thapa
Hi, * I have been exploring Node, Express and chiild_process since last few days. I have a static module with data (some array) which now I know how to show it to index page. * I can launch linux command and gets its output/error using chile_process. Now I need to know, How can I constantly

Re: [nodejs] OSX, a module, x86_64, i386, and a node compiled as a universal binary.

2013-02-08 Thread Isaac Schlueter
As far as I can tell, the node core team is unanimously opposed to continuing to support node-waf, or wscript files in modules. That's what it means when something is deprecated. "It might break, and we aren't going to care when it does." If you want to take on the burden of supporting Node 0.5

[nodejs] Elegant way to require('some-app-component')

2013-02-08 Thread Geerten van Meel
Hi, I am working on an app and would like to access a component of my app simply using require('component') instead of require('./component') or worse require('./path/to/component.js'). I know that there are ways to achieve this by doing some hack regarding the node_modules folder, but I would

Re: [nodejs] Re: nodeconf videos?

2013-02-08 Thread Arunoda Susiripala
I just only looked at Rick's talk. It was crazy. Beside I just found some small videos recorded by micheal vimeo. Here is my favourite: No - http://vimeo.com/56402326 On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Rick Waldron wrote: > I love this :) > > Rick > > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Isaac Schl

Re: [nodejs] Re: nodeconf videos?

2013-02-08 Thread Rick Waldron
I love this :) Rick On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Isaac Schlueter wrote: > Wow. This thread got pretty ridiculous, didn't it? I'm really > disappointed. > > People who put on conferences take on an absurd amount of > responsibility and put in an inhuman amount of work, and often end up > l

Re: [nodejs] Re: nodeconf videos?

2013-02-08 Thread Isaac Schlueter
Wow. This thread got pretty ridiculous, didn't it? I'm really disappointed. People who put on conferences take on an absurd amount of responsibility and put in an inhuman amount of work, and often end up losing a considerable amount of money in the process. If they do make a profit, it tends to

Re: [nodejs] Node v0.9.9 (Unstable)

2013-02-08 Thread Isaac Schlueter
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Jorge Chamorro wrote: >> * addon: Pass module object to NODE_MODULE init function (isaacs, Rod Vagg) > > What does this mean exactly, please? It means that your init function is void(Handle exports, Handle module) instead of void(Handle exports), so you can do "exp

Re: [nodejs] Re: nodeconf videos?

2013-02-08 Thread Jorge Chamorro
On 08/02/2013, at 23:08, Mikeal Rogers wrote: > http://www.futurealoof.com Awesome, thanks for sharing, love @izs' idea of "no" :-) -- -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message becaus

Re: [nodejs] Re: nodeconf videos?

2013-02-08 Thread Mikeal Rogers
Did you actually read what I wrote? I *could* release all the videos. I *won't* because they don't meet my standards. I won't release a video of a person standing in front of a screen talking if it doesn't convey their ideas as well as seeing the talk in person did. It doesn't do the speaker or

Re: [nodejs] Re: nodeconf videos?

2013-02-08 Thread Jorge Chamorro
On 08/02/2013, at 22:55, Mikeal Rogers wrote: > Jorge, what conference do you run again? One that's so much better than the rest that doesn't even release any videos, hahaha. FYI: tenconf.s3.amazonaws.com is throttling -to Spain, at least- @ 20-25kB/s so it's ~ impossible to see any of them (2

Re: [nodejs] Re: nodeconf videos?

2013-02-08 Thread Mikeal Rogers
Jorge, what conference do you run again? On Feb 8, 2013, at February 8, 20131:33 PM, Jorge Chamorro wrote: > On 08/02/2013, at 22:11, Pedro Teixeira wrote: > >> Yup, it also makes me a bit mad to watch the feeling of entitlement some >> people have over other's free time and work. > > Nah, *

Re: [nodejs] Re: Node package for Solaris 10 (x86)

2013-02-08 Thread Will Arroyo
Thanks again, I actually just figured it out right before your response. thanks for doing all the dirty work compiling it! its working great. On Friday, February 8, 2013 2:43:20 PM UTC-7, Peter Tribble wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Will Arroyo > > > wrote: > > > > thank you for t

Re: [nodejs] Node v0.9.9 (Unstable)

2013-02-08 Thread Jorge Chamorro
On 07/02/2013, at 19:36, Isaac Schlueter wrote: > 2013.02.07, Version 0.9.9 (Unstable) Lovely! Thank you! > * addon: Pass module object to NODE_MODULE init function (isaacs, Rod Vagg) What does this mean exactly, please? Cheers, -- Jorge. -- -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting gu

Re: [nodejs] Re: Node package for Solaris 10 (x86)

2013-02-08 Thread Peter Tribble
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Will Arroyo wrote: > > thank you for the help! I have got node running but i am having trouble with > npm...all i see in the bin directory is a npm-cli.js file. is this suppose > to be in my path? Oops (I didn't say I had thoroughly tested it). What I should have w

Re: [nodejs] Re: Node package for Solaris 10 (x86)

2013-02-08 Thread Will Arroyo
thank you for the help! I have got node running but i am having trouble with npm...all i see in the bin directory is a npm-cli.js file. is this suppose to be in my path? On Friday, February 8, 2013 11:42:27 AM UTC-7, Peter Tribble wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Will Arroyo > > >

Re: [nodejs] Re: nodeconf videos?

2013-02-08 Thread Jorge Chamorro
On 08/02/2013, at 22:11, Pedro Teixeira wrote: > Yup, it also makes me a bit mad to watch the feeling of entitlement some > people have over other's free time and work. Nah, *nodeconf*was*not*free*, so they must have forgotten to save some bucks for the online videos? And *he* came saying "(ou

Re: [nodejs] Re: nodeconf videos?

2013-02-08 Thread Dan Milon
Well, almost. I can go to the doctor for free, but I've paid taxes in order to do so. I get 1000 free minutes from my carrier, but I'm paying for a subscription. etc. My point is, many times what we get for free now, is the result of us paying in the past. This has nothing to do with nodeconf,

Re: [nodejs] Re: nodeconf videos?

2013-02-08 Thread Jorge Chamorro
>> @ JSConf they record and release all the talks: >> > > Yes, I know what other conferences do, especially JSConf's since I talk to > the organizers almost every day. Then you ought to ask them how do they do to record and release everything... -- -- Jo

Re: [nodejs] Re: nodeconf videos?

2013-02-08 Thread Jorge Chamorro
On 08/02/2013, at 22:08, Sara Chipps wrote: > Love when people get mad about the quality and availability of free things. Nodeconf? Was it free? Since when? -- -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You rec

Re: [nodejs] Re: nodeconf videos?

2013-02-08 Thread Pedro Teixeira
Yup, it also makes me a bit mad to watch the feeling of entitlement some people have over other's free time and work. @mikeal.beers++; -- Pedro On Friday, February 8, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Sara Chipps wrote: > Love when people get mad about the quality and availability of free things. > I can'

Re: [nodejs] Re: nodeconf videos?

2013-02-08 Thread Sara Chipps
Love when people get mad about the quality and availability of free things. I can't handle this mailing list ever. Sara J Chipps 862.201.3065 CTO http://levoleague.com #levolove Other projects: http://SaraJChipps.com http://GirlDevelopIt.com

Re: [nodejs] Re: nodeconf videos?

2013-02-08 Thread Mikeal Rogers
On Feb 8, 2013, at February 8, 201312:44 PM, Jorge Chamorro wrote: > On 08/02/2013, at 17:41, Mikeal Rogers wrote: > >> (...) NodeConf was higher than almost anything we'd seen. (...) NodeConf >> isn't like other conferences (...) > > O rly? like, super-mega-high? Yeah, it's totally lame to

Re: [nodejs] Re: nodeconf videos?

2013-02-08 Thread Jorge Chamorro
On 08/02/2013, at 17:41, Mikeal Rogers wrote: > (...) NodeConf was higher than almost anything we'd seen. (...) NodeConf > isn't like other conferences (...) O rly? like, super-mega-high? > You can view the videos we have done here: > http://2012.nodeconf.com/theatre/rick_waldron.html > http:/

Re: [nodejs] Re: nodeconf videos?

2013-02-08 Thread Alexey Petrushin
> . NodeConf was higher than almost anything we'd seen . NodeConf isn't like other conferences Hmmm, maybe it was superior, I wasn't there can't really say about it. But judging by online materials - videos don't even have a titles, and failing to find an average videocam nowadays - tha

Re: [nodejs] ZeroMQ Libraries

2013-02-08 Thread Ruben Tan
To add on to that, here are the few things to consider when writing the zmq binding: 1. REQ/REP should be a lockstep: REQ -> REP -> REQ -> REP. The binding's exported API should reflect this. 2. The rest (PUSH/PULL/ROUTER/DEALER/PUB/SUB) are all however, perfectly usable if used li

Re: [nodejs] Re: Node package for Solaris 10 (x86)

2013-02-08 Thread Peter Tribble
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Will Arroyo wrote: > Wow thanks for the fast response! I also already have curl installed, so in > order to use my own curl would I just change those sym links? No, if you arrange it so that it finds your curl first, then you'll be fine. You could then just delete

Re: [nodejs] ZeroMQ Libraries

2013-02-08 Thread Jacob Groundwater
Event emitters are synchronous, are they not? Anyways, it's up to you whether you want to support async req/rep, but that is not documented anywhere, and it breaks the principle of least-surprise. I would just suggest not using a callback-mechanism for req/rep socket. Have the handler just return

Re: [nodejs] Re: Node package for Solaris 10 (x86)

2013-02-08 Thread Will Arroyo
Wow thanks for the fast response! I also already have curl installed, so in order to use my own curl would I just change those sym links? On Friday, February 8, 2013 11:28:28 AM UTC-7, Peter Tribble wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Will Arroyo > > > wrote: > > I know this is an old t

Re: [nodejs] ZeroMQ Libraries

2013-02-08 Thread Michael Schoonmaker
My apologies. I'll add that to my list of requirements to test for. Thanks for the feedback! On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Ruben Tan wrote: > No, i think what jacob meant was that the req rep implementation in the > nodejs binding was flawed since it uses the event emitter to poll when it > s

Re: [nodejs] ZeroMQ Libraries

2013-02-08 Thread Ruben Tan
No, i think what jacob meant was that the req rep implementation in the nodejs binding was flawed since it uses the event emitter to poll when it should be sync instead. On Saturday, February 9, 2013, Michael Schoonmaker wrote: > Jacob, > I won't be changing the existing ZeroMQ semantics. REQ and

Re: [nodejs] Re: Node package for Solaris 10 (x86)

2013-02-08 Thread Peter Tribble
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Will Arroyo wrote: > I know this is an old thread but I want to use your package for solaris 10. > Only thing is I want to install it in my home directory not opt/node. how > can this be done? You can extract the files out of a package with pkgtrans, the only bit t

Re: [nodejs] ZeroMQ Libraries

2013-02-08 Thread Michael Schoonmaker
Jacob, I won't be changing the existing ZeroMQ semantics. REQ and REP require synchronicity because of the way they're designed. If you want asynchronous request/reply, check out DEALER and ROUTER. They're harder to work with, but much more powerful. Shuttle is built entirely with these two socket

[nodejs] Re: Right way to reuse HTTP Socket connection?

2013-02-08 Thread Jeremy
And that didn't work either. At least now I get the error from the server saying that it didn't work. Any ideas, please :) On Friday, February 8, 2013 12:18:45 PM UTC-6, Jeremy wrote: > > Please ignore my stupidity, I had a typo. Fixed and now working. But in > case anyone wants to know, 2nd

[nodejs] Re: Right way to reuse HTTP Socket connection?

2013-02-08 Thread Jeremy
Please ignore my stupidity, I had a typo. Fixed and now working. But in case anyone wants to know, 2nd call didn't have port, host, path.. var NTLMCall = function(options, callback){ var host = options.host; var port = options.port; var user = options.user; var pass = options.pass; va

Re: [nodejs] Re: Socket hang up problems

2013-02-08 Thread Mark Essel
heads up we patched up our communication with s3 https://github.com/fastsociety/node-knoxed-up md5sum puts, sha1 compares on gets and retries on hangups On Sunday, November 4, 2012 2:24:18 AM UTC-5, Mark Essel wrote: > > I've seen socket hangups putting and getting to and from s3 with Knox as >

[nodejs] Re: Node package for Solaris 10 (x86)

2013-02-08 Thread Will Arroyo
I know this is an old thread but I want to use your package for solaris 10. Only thing is I want to install it in my home directory not opt/node. how can this be done? On Sunday, July 24, 2011 7:59:30 AM UTC-6, Peter Tribble wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:23 PM, George Bailey > > > wrote:

Re: [nodejs] ZeroMQ Libraries

2013-02-08 Thread Ruben Tan
Yes. Please dont impose js idioms upon zmq. If anything, a simple binding even if it is synchronous would be far easier to work with. On Saturday, February 9, 2013, Jacob Groundwater wrote: > If you can, the request/reply socket is broken for any asynchronous > events, as ZMQ expects replies to o

Re: [nodejs] ZeroMQ Libraries

2013-02-08 Thread Jacob Groundwater
If you can, the request/reply socket is broken for any asynchronous events, as ZMQ expects replies to occur in the order they were asked. -- -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message be

Re: [nodejs] ZeroMQ Libraries

2013-02-08 Thread Ruben Tan
I have been mooting the same thoughts too. Go for it. On Saturday, February 9, 2013, Michael Schoonmaker wrote: > I want to make sure I'm not unnecessarily duplicating effort. > > The existing ZeroMQ library (https://npmjs.org/package/zmq) is > _perfect_ for a significant number of use cases. It

[nodejs] ZeroMQ Libraries

2013-02-08 Thread Michael Schoonmaker
I want to make sure I'm not unnecessarily duplicating effort. The existing ZeroMQ library (https://npmjs.org/package/zmq) is _perfect_ for a significant number of use cases. It handles a lot of the low-level socket management for you, automatically emitting 'message' events as new messages arrive.

Re: [nodejs] Re: nodeconf videos?

2013-02-08 Thread Sara Chipps
NodeConf sounds super fun, looking forward. Sara J Chipps 862.201.3065 CTO http://levoleague.com #levolove Other projects: http://SaraJChipps.com http://GirlDevelopIt.com http://ElizabethandClarke.com ---

Re: [nodejs] Re: What happens to hook.io?

2013-02-08 Thread Eric Mill
He's just baiting you guys. On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Matt wrote: > > Do you realize how insulting that is? > > It's Marak - did you expect different? He's not known for his > communication skills on this list :) > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Mark Hahn wrote: > >> Do you realize

Re: [nodejs] Re: nodeconf videos?

2013-02-08 Thread Mikeal Rogers
We spent a lot of time making sure the quality of NodeConf was higher than almost anything we'd seen. When the videos were done and we started running through them some of them didn't meet that quality standard. It had nothing to do with the recording quality or the speaker or the talk, some ta

Re: [nodejs] Re: http/ https server on same port

2013-02-08 Thread Ben Noordhuis
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:02 AM, V'Raj Kanwade wrote: > Ok. Let me rephrase the question: > > I am inside connectionHandler of net.createServer. Now when I determine the > data from client is HTTP request, I want to convert it to HTTPRequest object > so that I can leverage the HTTP headers, status

Re: [nodejs] Process mongodb records

2013-02-08 Thread Dan Milon
In case you're using just mongodb-native: http://mongodb.github.com/node-mongodb-native/api-generated/cursorstream.html On 02/08/2013 05:47 AM, Benjamin Clos wrote: > Mongoose.js allows for streaming of records as it finds them and is > useful for iterating over large populations. > -- -- Job

[nodejs] Process mongodb records

2013-02-08 Thread Benjamin Clos
Mongoose.js allows for streaming of records as it finds them and is useful for iterating over large populations. -- -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: [nodejs] Re: Node v0.9.9 (Unstable)

2013-02-08 Thread codepilot Account
0.9.(that new Mersenne Prime in the news) On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Arnout Kazemier wrote: > 0.9.10 > > On Feb 8, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Tim Dickinson wrote: > > The next version is 1.0.0 or 0.10.0? > > When would it be released? > > On Thursday, February 7, 2013 2:36:09 PM UTC-4, Isaac Schlue

Re: [nodejs] Re: Node v0.9.9 (Unstable)

2013-02-08 Thread Arnout Kazemier
0.9.10 On Feb 8, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Tim Dickinson wrote: > The next version is 1.0.0 or 0.10.0? > > When would it be released? > > On Thursday, February 7, 2013 2:36:09 PM UTC-4, Isaac Schlueter wrote: >> >> 2013.02.07, Version 0.9.9 (Unstable) >> >> * tls: port CryptoStream to streams2 (Fed

Re: [nodejs] Node v0.9.9 (Unstable)

2013-02-08 Thread Tim Dickinson
Yeah after posting I remembered that we are on 0.8.18 On Friday, February 8, 2013 11:10:29 AM UTC-4, Arunoda Susiripala wrote: > > you have to wait some more :-) > > On Friday, February 8, 2013, Tim Dickinson wrote: > >> The next version is 1.0.0 or 0.10.0? >> >> When would it be released? >> >>

Re: [nodejs] Node v0.9.9 (Unstable)

2013-02-08 Thread Arunoda Susiripala
you have to wait some more :-) On Friday, February 8, 2013, Tim Dickinson wrote: > The next version is 1.0.0 or 0.10.0? > > When would it be released? > > On Thursday, February 7, 2013 2:36:09 PM UTC-4, Isaac Schlueter wrote: >> >> 2013.02.07, Version 0.9.9 (Unstable) >> >> * tls: port CryptoStr

[nodejs] Re: Node v0.9.9 (Unstable)

2013-02-08 Thread Tim Dickinson
The next version is 1.0.0 or 0.10.0? When would it be released? On Thursday, February 7, 2013 2:36:09 PM UTC-4, Isaac Schlueter wrote: > > 2013.02.07, Version 0.9.9 (Unstable) > > * tls: port CryptoStream to streams2 (Fedor Indutny) > > * typed arrays: only share ArrayBuffer backing store (Ben

Re: [nodejs] Re: nodeconf videos?

2013-02-08 Thread Katsumoto
We are in 2013 already, but still no videos? Not planning to share them? Thanks. пятница, 6 июля 2012 г., 21:06:09 UTC+3 пользователь Mikeal Rogers написал: > > We spent a lot more time and money on the videos this year. It will take > some time to edit them but they will go up. > > One problem

[nodejs] [ANN] Raft v0.2.0

2013-02-08 Thread Tim Dickinson
Raft is a PaaS for node. Raft supports a wide range of functions to run multi-user, multi-app, mulit-infa. A lot of inspiration has come from the great people at nodejitu, nodester and AppFog. Raft features - App spawn-er - Dependency support with npm - File-system chroot

[nodejs] Re: Is it possible to use node.js to built very simple cross-platform app?

2013-02-08 Thread Floby
I would say it's not crazy to do that in node, but you'll probably have to package the node binary along. you could use node-webkit https://github.com/rogerwang/node-webkit wich has tray support for windows i believe. On Thursday, 7 February 2013 18:40:39 UTC+1, Alexey Petrushin wrote: > > It se

Re: [nodejs] Re: OpenEmbedded cross-building native libraries with node-gyp

2013-02-08 Thread Kevin Baker
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:57 PM, mscdex wrote: > On Feb 7, 8:41 pm, Kevin Baker wrote: > > FWIW I have a gypified version that also works on node 0.9.4+ and > Windows, with FTS support here: https://github.com/mscdex/node-sqlite-fts > Wow, thanks for the updated version! That version compiles and